John Crichton
First Post
I agree, but it's more like 1 out of 10,000.WayneLigon said:I'd bet money that no more than 1 out of 10 people watching this show even know what a Wendigo is.
I agree, but it's more like 1 out of 10,000.WayneLigon said:I'd bet money that no more than 1 out of 10 people watching this show even know what a Wendigo is.
Hey man, unless they actually put the title on screen while the episode aired, there's not much chance of me seeing it. Which is good for them, actually, because I might've just skipped last week's ep and returned for this week's if I'd known what was coming.Crothian said:I do find it amusing though that in and episode titled Wendigo, someone wanted there to be something else.
The effects of cannibalism in the Wendigo myth are campy and a tad overdone, sure, the former being a function of the latter. That's part of the comedic genius of Ravenous. Wikipedia points to a few more than maybe two or three media presentations, and Wikipedia is far from exhaustive. If we weren't already getting hit with staples of the genre in the second episode I'd be singing a different tune, but it seems a little early to me to be getting this generic stuff. As far as horrifying and grotesque go, if you find anything about Supernatural so far horrifying or grotesque, that's great for you, but it takes a little more than a really bad costume and makeup job or a lady in white clothes to get to me. Some better direction would be nice, for starters. Horror's all about how you frame things. Otherwise, Shaun of the Dead would be horrifying and grotesque too, right? Because there's flesh eating there, so it must be creepy. I did appreciate how they kept the Wendigo visually in the peripheral for most of the episode, but then later you get a good shot of it and it's really pretty silly looking.WayneLigon said:OK, so let me get this straight. You find the Wendigo legend, which has maybe been done in two or three media presentations to date, to be 'old hat', and cannibalism is campy and cheesy instead of horrifying and grotesque? I'd bet money that no more than 1 out of 10 people watching this show even know what a Wendigo is. To them, it's not old hat. It's totally brand new to them, just like the other things the brothers mentioned.
Wayside said:Wikipedia points to a few more than maybe two or three media presentations, and Wikipedia is far from exhaustive.
I had the same thought as the show came to a close. But I'll leave it on faith that we'll get some direction at the start of the new ep.Joshua Dyal said:The other nitpick, probably less minor in the grand scheme of things, is that the episode ended without any clear direction of where the next episode is going to come from.
Crothian said:So far the two shows have been good, I'm only now watching the second one. I understand that people want more connection between the episodes but should you wait until that doesn't happen before complaining about it?
Joshua Dyal said:The other nitpick, probably less minor in the grand scheme of things, is that the episode ended without any clear direction of where the next episode is going to come from.
It's not the formula, it's how it's used. It was great on Buffy, it's cartoonish on Smallville. So far, it's pretty good on Supernatural.Steverooo said:Well, I'm not liking it, so much... It's definitely a "Freak-of-the-Week" show, and that gets old, quickly... This will, too!
I didn't really expect them to find Dad, and/or get any info on the Anima Sola, this week, but I was surely hoping that it wouldn't become a Freak-of-the-Week Show, with Dad just being used as an occasional plot device!... YAWN!
It's formulaic, and old, already. I want something new...![]()

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.