muffin_of_chaos
First Post
The possibility I'm presenting in this thread is that Rangers should no longer will be thought of as hunters or park rangers...they have the capability, with the optional skills they can choose, but primarily they are the damage-focused variant of the fighter class.
Fighter and Ranger are just labels for "Defender using martial abilities" and "Martial striker that engages enemies directly in melee or from ranged" respectively.
Whether or not this is true is moot (we haven't seen enough powers/etc. to know); the question is that if it is true, will complaints about the apparent lack of two-weapon fighting available be unfounded?
Fighter and Ranger are just labels for "Defender using martial abilities" and "Martial striker that engages enemies directly in melee or from ranged" respectively.
Whether or not this is true is moot (we haven't seen enough powers/etc. to know); the question is that if it is true, will complaints about the apparent lack of two-weapon fighting available be unfounded?