They can never be equal since it depends on AC. But there needs to be somewhere between 4 and 5 points of difference between the two for each to be meaningfully useful.Kitirat said:For an average AC of a monets with assumed max stat (18), what bonus to hit would careful strike require to equal or surpass twin strike in chance to do damage/average damage?
Ziana said:It's when Careful Attack hits on 18-20 but Twin Strike only hits on 20 that CA has a slight advantage over TS (15% vs 9.75%). In all other circumstances, They're either on-par, or TS is better.
Doesn't impact expected damage much.You could add damage bonus from stat back into Careful Strike. Or add half stat bonus, or Wisdom bonus. These are some of the simpler fixes, if you feel it needs fixing. I still think your average Ranger will attack with twin strike 90% of the time when he needs to choose between at-will powers. I can only think this is intentional.Kitirat said:What about this minor alteration.
Careful strike criticals on a 18-20 naturally instead of a nautral 20.
Sound good?
Agreed. I'm sure there won't be a replacement, but the Martial sourcebook will likely have at least one more at-will ability for the ranger to choose, so you won't feel as bad about ignoring its existance.Styracosaurus said:Careful Strike just isn't as much fun as the other Ranger at-wills.
Careful Strike should just be something else entirely than a bonus to damage or to hit.
As it stands, Careful Strike directly competes with Twin Strike and small alterations in the attack roll or damage roll really doesn't change that. It just needs to be something more unique.