Darrin Drader
Explorer
This whole thing is such a bizarre situation. I have no experience with Rob Kuntz on a personal level, so I can't say whether I completely trust his version of the story or not. The one thing I can say is that Clark has always treated me with respect, and he's even stepped in as a mediator in one case when I was getting hot under the collar at another D20 professional. The sad thing about that was that it all started over a misunderstanding, and I feel bad for the harsh words I'd said back then.
The correspondance that RK posted seem to start at a middle point rather than a beginning point, and the disagreements seem to be glossed over. It appears that Rob's issues are that he was working without a contract in more than one case, and it seems that Clark was having difficulties getting the Maze series into D20 format. I've done several pieces of work for companies like WotC with Dragon Magazine, Bastion Press, etc. and I've completed projects many times before having contract in hand. Maybe NG was waiting for the finished work before promising money. Maybe they were simply too busy to get them written up. I seriously doubt that a company with their standing and reputation would simply try to get RK's work for free. We've heard one side of the story. I would be interested in hearing the other side. I also find it interesting that the problems seemed to start right around the publication of Necropolis. We all know that Gary and Rob have had their legal differences in the past :shrug:
As for the controversy surrounding the City of Brass, I don't think it is out of line for NG to do a version of it as long as they scrap any of RK's original work that they had been given. If it does use the work he sent them, then I would have a serious problem with their ethics. I can completely understand why they would choose to go forward with this project though. Like they've said, it is based on mythology, it is a staple in classic D&D, and they want to do it.
In addition to this, when RK pulled out of his contract with Necromancer, there were a lot of RK fans disappointed that City of Brass apparently wasn't going to be published, and there were probably an equal number of NG fans that were equally disappointed that NG wasn't going to publish it. If any company has tried to stay true to the first edition feel of D&D and update it to 3rd edition, that would be NG. They started out wanting to do this product, and now they intend to continue forward with it.
So, In NG's defense, they've had good relationships with Gary Gygax, WotC, and other known industry professionals like Mike Mearls, whereas the only real history we know about RK is the lawsuit that happened all those years ago. I find it an interesting coincidence that RK once again finds himself at odds with a publisher.
So, who to believe? I don't really know without more information. Either way, I respect the work of them both and I hope that this doesn't tarnish the reputation of either of them.
The correspondance that RK posted seem to start at a middle point rather than a beginning point, and the disagreements seem to be glossed over. It appears that Rob's issues are that he was working without a contract in more than one case, and it seems that Clark was having difficulties getting the Maze series into D20 format. I've done several pieces of work for companies like WotC with Dragon Magazine, Bastion Press, etc. and I've completed projects many times before having contract in hand. Maybe NG was waiting for the finished work before promising money. Maybe they were simply too busy to get them written up. I seriously doubt that a company with their standing and reputation would simply try to get RK's work for free. We've heard one side of the story. I would be interested in hearing the other side. I also find it interesting that the problems seemed to start right around the publication of Necropolis. We all know that Gary and Rob have had their legal differences in the past :shrug:
As for the controversy surrounding the City of Brass, I don't think it is out of line for NG to do a version of it as long as they scrap any of RK's original work that they had been given. If it does use the work he sent them, then I would have a serious problem with their ethics. I can completely understand why they would choose to go forward with this project though. Like they've said, it is based on mythology, it is a staple in classic D&D, and they want to do it.
In addition to this, when RK pulled out of his contract with Necromancer, there were a lot of RK fans disappointed that City of Brass apparently wasn't going to be published, and there were probably an equal number of NG fans that were equally disappointed that NG wasn't going to publish it. If any company has tried to stay true to the first edition feel of D&D and update it to 3rd edition, that would be NG. They started out wanting to do this product, and now they intend to continue forward with it.
So, In NG's defense, they've had good relationships with Gary Gygax, WotC, and other known industry professionals like Mike Mearls, whereas the only real history we know about RK is the lawsuit that happened all those years ago. I find it an interesting coincidence that RK once again finds himself at odds with a publisher.
So, who to believe? I don't really know without more information. Either way, I respect the work of them both and I hope that this doesn't tarnish the reputation of either of them.