Ultimate Feat Survivor ROUND IS OVER

[Dextolen]

I can't believe power attack is losing. Power attack is sooo useful at higher levels. :\

 

[Psion]

These were my original picks to be the last two left.

Anyway, voting off Power Attack due to aforementioned "universal appeal" factor of II. When you don't know what to take, you take II.

But it's not so overpowered that if you are working on a feat chain, you can't afford to skip it.

A fine feat. Power attack isn't even worthy to be in the same room.

 

[Greylock]

Buh-bye, POWER ATTACK.

 

[Remathilis]

I dunno. Imp Init is useful for high dex fighters, low dex clerics, and just about anyone else that needs to act first (SA, buff spells, Group-nuke spells).

Power attack requires you to be strong and hit stuff. Good for fighters and clerics, bad for rogues and wizards.

Since finesse is gone, go Imp Init.

 

[Blackthorne]

I cannot believe how these two made it this far. Power Attack is broken IMHO and Imp Init is an overrated piece of crap. No vote from me.

 

[Kerrick]

I was going to vote II off, just because I thought Power Attack would take it all, but your arguments have swayed me. I have never had a character take PA, though I do see its usefulness (I don't usually play heavy hitters), but I often take II. So, regretfully: good-bye Power Attack.

 

[Ryltar]

Go away, PA.

 

[lonesoldier]

Into the Abyss with you Power Attack.

 

[Dakkareth]

Power Attack, because I always take Improved Initiative.

 

[maggot]

Power Attack must go. Improved Initiative was my guess as the overall winner as one of the few feats that can be taken by anyone, is useful to anyone that takes it, and is actually worth a feat. If power attack had no prerequisite and applied to spells, it might be able to compete. But Improved Initiative would still win based on its sheer simplicity. Power Attack 3.5 is a mess.

Power Attack, you are the weakest link, goodbye.