• The VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!

WotC [Updated!] Hasbro Laying Off 1,100 Employees

Reports of D&D staff losses start to emerge.

IMG_2137.png

Just announced, Hasbro will be laying off an additional 1,100 employees after laying off 800 earlier this year. Some will be laid off this week, some over the coming months. People affected so far include Mike Mearls, Dan Dillon, Amy Dallen, and others.

CEO Chris Cocks commented that “headwinds we saw through the first nine months of the year have continued into Holiday are likely to persist into 2024”. An email to staff, also published in the Wall Street Journal, said:

While we’re confident in the future of Hasbro, the current environment demands that we do more, even if these choices are some of the hardest we have to make.

I know this news is especially difficult during the holiday season. There is no sugar-coating how hard this is, particularly for the employees directly affected.

The issues appear to largely affect Hasbro’s extensive toy sales business. Various folk working on D&D at WotC have started making statements which indicate that layoffs are happening right now:
  • D&D designer Dan Dillon: “Well. Today was my last day at Wizards. Not sure what's next.”
  • Graphic designer Trystan Falcone: “To everyone at WotC getting cut today & especially my fellow D&D team members: May your talent & passion be recognized and rewarded by the lucky teams that snatch you up. You are irreplaceable. To other studios, we are losing incredible folks. Scoop them ASAP. It’s Hasbro's loss.
  • Dixon Dubow, creator relations: “Words cannot describe. So many talented friends and coworkers, simply gone.”
  • Art director Bree Heiss: “Much to my surprise, it is my last day at Wizards. It was an honor and a joy to work on the games I love with people who have become family. If you know anywhere that is looking for a sassy art director with some mad skills, please let me know.”
  • Senior Development Editor Eytan Bernstein: "Hi folks. I was one of the people laid of during the Hasbro layoff this week. I know of four other people on the D&D team who confirmed they were affected, but I'll leave it to them if they want to post about it. This includes folks on the art, design, editorial, and product management depts., and that's just who I've heard about. I have a giant ball of emotions right now. I haven't figured out my next steps yet. If you know of an opportunity that might be a good fit for me, please let me know. I am open for freelance (or full-time) design, editing, fiction, and inclusivity reviews. If it combines RPGs with education, accessibility, or inclusivity, that's also cool. I freely welcome positive thoughts, hugs, and "you're awesomes!" I don't feel awesome right now."
  • Amy Dallen, DnD Beyond producer/host: "I’m deeply proud of the work I got to do at D&D Beyond and Wizards. Thank you to everyone who played a role in those many good memories. I’m not sure what’s next, but I do hope you’ll continue to support the incredible colleagues who remain, who I’ll miss very much."
  • Larry Frum, senior communicatons manager: "As part of the recent Hasbro headcount reductions, I have been let go from Wizards of the Coast, effective itoday. I cannot tell you how honored it has been to work with the wonderful and talented people at WOTC. Being a part of Wizards was a dream job come true for me when I joined a little over a year ago. It is time to start a "new game" and roll for initiative on my next adventure. Please let me know if you hear of anything where I might be a good fit. Excited by what is next."
  • Mike Mearls--previously senior management on D&D but who has been on the MtG team for a few years now--is also one of the people let go, along with many other people working on the Magic: The Gathering side of WotC: "Yes, I was laid off by WotC. Yes, I am doing fine and excited by what's to come. And yes, I have a pretty amazing circle of friends. I'm going to take a nap then get back to the work of forging the future."
  • David McDarby, game designer on MtG: "Sadly, my position at Wizards of the Coast was eliminated today along with many others due to the Hasbro layoffs. I've absolutely loved working at WotC and making Magic Tabletop/MTGO/MTG Arena the best it can be these past 9 years, and I'm looking for my next opportunity!"
  • Paul Cheon, talent manager: “Unfortunately, I will no longer be working for WotC as I was one of the many that were hit by the Hasbro layoffs. It was an absolute dream to work on the game that I've loved playing for over 20 years. Future is unclear but I may fire up a stream after the New Year!”
  • Rob Sather, D&D Art Manager: “Yesterday was surprisingly my last day of work at Wizards as D&D TRPG Studio's Art Manager. My position was eliminated, nothing to do with performance. Can't even utter a snarky quip or light-hearted anecdote, just feeling gutted.”
  • Other confirmed folks include Chris Lindsay (who created DMs Guild), Liz Schuh (licensing and publishing manager), Natalie Egan, community manager Jesse J Hill, and art director Mike Vaillancourt, Vanessa Cuanan (Associate Systems Administrator), Michael Rexford (Senior Data Scientist), Ellie Lockhart (Analytics Engineer), Jana Hodgins (Technical Producer), Megan Galbraith Donahue (Director of MTG Universes Beyond Creative and Production), Deserae Dawn, (Program Manager), David Hartless (D&D Beyond director), Shay Pierce (senior software engineer).
Chris Cocks’ full email reads as follows:

Team,  

A year ago, we laid out our strategy to focus on building fewer, bigger, better brands and began the process of transforming Hasbro. Since then, we’ve had some important wins, like retooling our supply chain, improving our inventory position, lowering costs, and reinvesting over $200M back into the business while growing share across many of our categories. But the market headwinds we anticipated have proven to be stronger and more persistent than planned. While we’re confident in the future of Hasbro, the current environment demands that we do more, even if these choices are some of the hardest we have to make.

Today we’re announcing additional headcount reductions as part of our previously communicated strategic transformation, affecting approximately 1,100 colleagues globally in addition to the roughly 800 reductions already taken.

Our leadership team came to this difficult decision after much deliberation. We recognize this is heavy news that affects the livelihoods of our friends and colleagues. Our focus is communicating with each of you transparently and supporting you through this period of change. I want to start by addressing why we are doing this now, and what’s next.

Why now?

We entered 2023 expecting a year of change including significant updates to our leadership team, structure, and scope of operations. We anticipated the first three quarters to be challenging, particularly in Toys, where the market is coming off historic, pandemic-driven highs. While we have made some important progress across our organization, the headwinds we saw through the first nine months of the year have continued into Holiday and are likely to persist into 2024.

To position Hasbro for growth, we must first make sure our foundation is solid and profitable. To do that, we need to modernize our organization and get even leaner. While we see workforce reductions as a last resort, given the state of our business, it’s a lever we must pull to keep Hasbro healthy.

What happens next?

While we’re making changes across the entire organization, some functional areas will be affected more than others. Many of those whose roles are affected have been or will be informed in the next 24 hours, although the timings will vary by country, in line with local rules and subject to employee consultations where required. This includes team members who have raised their hands to step down from their roles at the end of the year as part of our Voluntary Early Retirement Program (VRP) in the U.S. We’re immensely grateful to these colleagues for their many years of dedication, and we wish them all the best.

The majority of the notifications will happen over the next six months, with the balance occurring over the next year as we tackle the remaining work on our organizational model. This includes standardizing processes within Finance, HR, IT and Consumer Care as part of our Global Business Enablement project, but it also means doing more work across the entire business to minimize management layers and create a nimbler organization.

What else are we doing?

I know this news is especially difficult during the holiday season. We value each of our team members – they aren’t just employees, they’re friends and colleagues. We decided to communicate now so people have time to plan and process the changes. For those employees affected we are offering comprehensive packages including job placement support to assist in their transition.

We’ve also done what we can to minimize the scale of impact, like launching the VRP and exploring options to reduce our global real estate footprint. On that note, our Providence, Rhode Island office is currently not being used to its full capacity and we’ve decided to exit the space at the end of the lease term in January 2025. Over the next year, we’ll welcome teams from our Providence office to our headquarters down the road in Pawtucket, Rhode Island. It’s an opportunity to reshape how we work and ensure our workspace is vibrant and productive, while reflecting our more flexible in-person cadence since the pandemic.

Looking ahead

As Gina often says, cost-cutting is not a strategy. We know this, and that’s why we’ll continue to grow and invest in several areas in 2024.

As we uncover more cost savings, we’ll invest in new systems, insights and analytics, product development and digital – all while strengthening our leading franchises and ensuring our brands have the essential marketing they need to thrive well into the future.

We’ll also tap into unlocked potential across our business, like our new supply chain efficiency, our direct-to-consumer capabilities, and key partnerships to maximize licensing opportunities, scale entertainment, and free up our own content dollars to drive new brand development.

I know there is no sugar-coating how hard this is, particularly for the employees directly affected. We’re grateful to them for their contributions, and we wish them all the best. In the coming weeks, let’s support each other, and lean in to drive through these necessary changes, so we can return our business to growth and carry out Hasbro’s mission.

Thanks,
Chris
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Sorry to hear you were let go without enough to support you through it. Very glad I live in Europe and we have legal protections once you’ve worked for a company long enough,

I recently went through the redundancy process myself) where 50% of my equivalent were let go. Tough times. I wouldn’t wish it on anyone, but I can see why it happens sometimes. It’s the protections that matter most so that when it does happen people can move on and still feed their kids.
I wouldn't have been so upset about it if they gave me a legit severance. But they laid us off on the last day of the month so that all benefits were immediately lost, and then gave me one pay period -- two weeks -- of pay. So long as American corporations act like this, I don't give a darn about any of them. I'm glad when they go underwater. If they treated their employees right, then it's a shame. Otherwise, screw'em.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Maxperson

Morkus from Orkus
Having worked the last 3.5 months following a 'staff reduction' I can tell you that there really hasnt been a day thats gone by where someone hasnt mentioned their own unease and wondering when the axe will fall on them next time.

Not accounting for the extra work everyone left gets to do, and the decline in quality (you can have it done well, quick, or cheap, pick 2) and yeah.

Also, having been in middle management before, they generally care. Its just their job to make it work out after. Its the top level that doesnt give a naughty word, and just needs to find that numerical balance between revenue and wages, while they make the huge salary.
Not everyone in upper management is that way. My wife was COO of a corporation that was bought out by a fortune 500 company. When the buyout happened, there was a large workforce reduction and a promise that no further reductions would happen for 5 years, and that they had that long to become profitable. My wife was also put in charge of her entire company at that time, but they didn't change her title for some reason(probably they'd have to pay her more). She went to her staff and assured them that no more layoffs would happen for 5 years and put them at ease.

Anyway, one year later she was called in by someone in the parent corporation and told that she had to axe half of her workforce. She did as she was instructed and then put in her two weeks notice, telling them that she had a lot of personal integrity and she relied on what they said when she told the company no more reductions would be happened. When they thought it was just a play by her to get more money, they asked her to name her price(she's excellent at what she does), she also told them that they had caused her to lose integrity(since she didn't have the option to blame higher ups) and refused to take back her resignation.

She ended up going to a company that had been trying to poach her for years and had been turned down by her since with integrity comes loyalty. Now the new company has an amazing upper manager with integrity and loyalty.
 

Scribe

Legend
Not everyone in upper management is that way. My wife was COO of a corporation that was bought out by a fortune 500 company. When the buyout happened, there was a large workforce reduction and a promise that no further reductions would happen for 5 years, and that they had that long to become profitable. My wife was also put in charge of her entire company at that time, but they didn't change her title for some reason(probably they'd have to pay her more). She went to her staff and assured them that no more layoffs would happen for 5 years and put them at ease.

Anyway, one year later she was called in by someone in the parent corporation and told that she had to axe half of her workforce. She did as she was instructed and then put in her two weeks notice, telling them that she had a lot of personal integrity and she relied on what they said when she told the company no more reductions would be happened. When they thought it was just a play by her to get more money, they asked her to name her price(she's excellent at what she does), she also told them that they had caused her to lose integrity(since she didn't have the option to blame higher ups) and refused to take back her resignation.

She ended up going to a company that had been trying to poach her for years and had been turned down by her since with integrity comes loyalty. Now the new company has an amazing upper manager with integrity and loyalty.

Good on her, but seems like the exception that proves the rule for me.
 

darjr

I crit!
Stephen says that magic and D&D especially haven’t been helping as much as people think.

Also he says Hasbro is probably depending upon DnDBeyond to make subscription money for them in a big way.

Also says to pay attention if Hasbro sells any properties here on out.

I dunno about any of what he says. But his raw data usually seems right. I usually have issue with his conclusions though. But who am I?

 


Scribe

Legend
Stephen says that magic and D&D especially haven’t been helping as much as people think.

Do we have numbers on D&D profit margin? I would think it being such a smaller team, it would help them? MTG, well I'm on record as feeling they grossly mismanaged it.
 

TwoSix

Dirty, realism-hating munchkin powergamer
It does give you a sort of moral dilemma in that if you attack Hasbro for OGL powerlust or whatever you are more likely to hurt some designer or receptionist or janitor than the Corporate Masters in their boardroom who made the decision.
Once someone ascends to the level of CEO or Board Member of a major company, they're essentially part of a nigh-untouchable aristocracy.

When you support their company, you help them by making their business successful. If you boycott their company, the company's pain is simply transferred to the workers under them.
 

Ugh, only now do I see the thumbnail photo of his video. Erg apologies for the click bait. Still I think there is interesting things in the video.
I generally like some of the discussion on their streams, but man, they are definitely playing the YouTube algorithm game with their clips..

OT, but I like how Mark referred to his own YouTube channel as an utter failure because he doesn't do that stuff. Linda and him are great to listen to if game design theory is your thing.
 


TheSword

Legend
Once someone ascends to the level of CEO or Board Member of a major company, they're essentially part of a nigh-untouchable aristocracy.

When you support their company, you help them by making their business successful. If you boycott their company, the company's pain is simply transferred to the workers under them.
I have to disagree. I think when you get to that point you are often utterly expendable and judged purely on your results and the impact on the business. I see many more ruthless cuts amongst board members than amongst department heads. There is a running joke amongst us senior managers that if you present at our annual conference (mainly board) then you have a 50-50 chance of being around for the next one.

A lot of what we are talking about here comes from company culture. That’s going to be led by the board, the type of ownership, the industry you’re in, the country you operate in, the financial success of the business and the attitude of the workforce. The last one shouldn’t be underestimated.

I’m lucky to work in a profitable industry that finds it hard to recruit and is based in a European country so we generally get looked after well. Redundancy payments are uplifted by 50% on top of the statutory requirements. We were paid all through furlough and we’ve had a reasonable pay rise every year. However the company has still made significant redundancies every year for the last 5 years. Being a good company who looks after their team and making people redundant is not mutually exclusive.
 

Related Articles

Remove ads

Remove ads

Top