Use of BoEF, N&D, Nymphology or the GUCK

Does your campaign have use for the BoEF, Naughty & Dice, Nymphology or the GUCK?

  • Yes. My campaign has sexual/erotic themes and sources like these help.

    Votes: 4 2.3%
  • Yes. While sex and eroticism aren't the focus of my games these situations do happen.

    Votes: 30 17.5%
  • Yes. Though I limit the use and the sexual activities of PCs is left off camera.

    Votes: 19 11.1%
  • Yes. Though only for the non-sexual, non-erotic material they contain, such as spells and monsters.

    Votes: 3 1.8%
  • Maybe. If my players and I all feel comfortable with incorporating these types of sources.

    Votes: 11 6.4%
  • Maybe. But probably only for the non-sexual, non-erotic material, like spells and monsters.

    Votes: 3 1.8%
  • No. While sex and eroticism take place in my games, it's best left to the imagination alone.

    Votes: 51 29.8%
  • No. Sex and eroticism simply don't come up in my games at all.

    Votes: 20 11.7%
  • No. Sex and eroticism have no place in the game and I won't use any of these sources.

    Votes: 16 9.4%
  • No. And because of their relation with sex & eroticism I won't even use the non-sexual, non-erotic

    Votes: 14 8.2%


log in or register to remove this ad


ArthurQ said:
Although i've linked my personal journal and people are welcome to read it, it is WRONG to cut and paste parts of my journal out of context. Its wrong to paste it at all, especially without my permission. Id rather not have to lock my journal due to people like you.
What I quoted was, by no stretch of the imagination, out of context. Take a stroll on over to his weblog (link on first page of thread) if you have any doubts.
 


Kahuna Burger said:
I'll give you that it was inappropriate, BUT being as big a booster as you are of a guide to (among other things) sexual relations in rpgs, it really can't surprise you that someone thought your public comments on the opposite sex were worth noting... And I can't give you "WRONG", unfortunately, just inapropriate..

Kahuna burger


I dont see your logic here? Because i support a product that deals with sex and erotica in RPG's that means I cant be upset with women for doing completly stupid and illogical things? We all have our own relationships and dealings with the opposite sex. How I deal with women in my private life have absolutly no effect on this or what I support. At least i HAVE relationships with women, even if they go sour. Thats normal for anyone. I dont see how my thoughts or comments toward her actions were innappropriate in anyway.
 

tburdett said:
What I quoted was, by no stretch of the imagination, out of context. Take a stroll on over to his weblog (link on first page of thread) if you have any doubts.
Everyone is welcome to read my journal and my thoughts.
Remember that I use language that would make Erics Granma's toes curl however.

Can we get back on topic now?
 



ArthurQ said:
Yes, I think that's just common sense.
thanks for saying so.
Yeah you would... He was able to read your directions in your journal. :rolleyes:

Anyhow to get this back on subject, or at least mostly their, if the press release had been more tame and the books name was "The Book of Romantic Fantasy" and pretty much nothing else was changed I wonder how much of an uproar their would have been.
 

Perhaps it would have been.
Also Valar could have used a smattering of Nude and None nude photography in such a book and possibly would have received a much better reception.

But Anthony, like myself in my journal, doesnt appear like he wants to self censor himself or his vision. (This is my opinion, i dont know what he would have to say about this.)

In fact its a very good question and I think it would be cool if you asked that on the valar boards to see what he would say.
 

Remove ads

Top