Artoomis said:
This implies that you may use them grappling (move into the same square). The line about using them as a weapon implies thta you need to use your arms (thus have a hand free) because else how would you attack?
Artoomis said:Spiked armor is primarily for grappling. It's fairly obvious, isn't it, that you need a free hand to attack as a melee weapon because otherwise you'd have to be in your opponent's square to reach them.
splitinfinitude said:Hyp's right. The monk example simply applies twf to a monk.
Otherwise, you could have an infinite (well, large) number of attacks - don't limit yourself to knees, etc. I would have:
Spiked armor
Bladed kneecaps
Bladed elbows
Bladed tootsies
Spiked helmet
etc.
A lot of these stupid things were available in 2E. Lame.
Besides, the question was about AsoO (Attacks of Opportunity), where you only get one to a customer, Combat Reflexes notwithstanding.
Btw.... I wanna see some guy shooting a bow with any armoured gauntlet, let alone a spiked one
Darklone said:Btw.... I wanna see some guy shooting a bow with any armoured gauntlet, let alone a spiked one![]()
KaeYoss said:
Of course I would. In one hand, he uses a thrown weapon, in the other, a melee weapon. Since a dagger is one-handed, that tactic works. But switching the dagger from "melee-position" to "throwing position" is the same as drawing a weapon.
Some knives are thrown with a grip on the blade, and some with a grip on the handle. Just a comment from a knife-thrower. Not to argue this point, since one could use a hand axe in the same example, and they are always thrown with a handle grip.
This Buckler thread is giving me a headache....I like the idea of a Buckler from a visual point, but they do seem a bit muddled as far as the rules for their use go. Hopefully 3.5 will clear it up.