D&D 3E/3.5 v4: Challenge Ratings pdf (3.5 compatible)

[kreynolds]

I'd be happy to take a look.
velorum@duelingdms.com

 

[Upper_Krust]

Hi all!

Okay thats enough volunteers (five other people now have it).

I will review their feedback and fix anything that needs fixing, then post it on the boards.

 

[Matrix Sorcica]

Hi all!

Okay thats enough volunteers (five other people now have it).

I will review their feedback and fix anything that needs fixing, then post it on the boards.

DAMN! Oh Damn!

Gone from the computer one bloody evening and see what happens!

Guess I'll just have to wait for version 5 like other mortals...




P.S. Hurry up you guys and give the man some feedback!

 

[kreynolds]

UK,

So far, everything looks great. First, I'd like to thank you for including the option duration modifiers for always active or at will spell-like abilities. That will help me tremendously. Anyway, a one small thing and one really, really, really small thing...

The small thing; page 7, weapon immunity (half damage) and weapon immunity (no damage); I'm assuming that both of these represent one type of weapon, such as slashing, bludgeoning, or piercing, right? Just want to be sure.

The really, really, really small thing; page 9, ECL WITH SILVER RULE (OPTIONAL); there's a tiny typo here... "For thos epeople..."

Other than this, everything is looking beautiful.

I do have one question though, in regards to ECL. Where did you (or whomever did) come up with the method of determing a monster's ECL when including wealth by simply multiplying the CR Result-1 by x1.24? It was such a frickin' pain for me before, what with the ECL jumping up two or three times, that I had to make a damn spreadsheet to help me out with it. Anyways, I haven't actually compared this method with my spreadsheet, but it's simplicity is awesome.

Great work!

 

[Upper_Krust]

Hey Sorcica mate!

DAMN! Oh Damn!

Gone from the computer one bloody evening and see what happens!

Easy tiger! You know theres nothing but love for you here, you have helped out as much as anyone this time around. If it meant that much to you I would email you the prototype v5 - you know that...

Guess I'll just have to wait for version 5 like other mortals...

P.S. Hurry up you guys and give the man some feedback!

...though you may as well wait until tomorrow, then you'll get it errata free.

So far feedback has shown about half a dozen minor mistakes.

 

[Upper_Krust]

UK,

Hiya mate!

So far, everything looks great.

Thats what I like to hear!

First, I'd like to thank you for including the option duration modifiers for always active or at will spell-like abilities. That will help me tremendously.

My pleasure mate. Note that none of the Revised CRs use this rule.

Anyway, a one small thing and one really, really, really small thing...

Fire away.

The small thing; page 7, weapon immunity (half damage) and weapon immunity (no damage); I'm assuming that both of these represent one type of weapon, such as slashing, bludgeoning, or piercing, right? Just want to be sure.

No. All three types of weaponry.

The really, really, really small thing; page 9, ECL WITH SILVER RULE (OPTIONAL); there's a tiny typo here... "For thos epeople..."

Okay thanks.

Other than this, everything is looking beautiful.

Sweet. I appreciate the feedback mate. If you find anything else let me know.

I do have one question though, in regards to ECL. Where did you (or whomever did) come up with the method of determing a monster's ECL when including wealth by simply multiplying the CR Result-1 by x1.24? It was such a frickin' pain for me before, what with the ECL jumping up two or three times, that I had to make a damn spreadsheet to help me out with it. Anyways, I haven't actually compared this method with my spreadsheet, but it's simplicity is awesome.

Its really good isn't it! I'm very happy with that one.

Lets just say I had a moment of divine inspiration.

Great work!

I'm getting a warm glow all over.

...maybe thats just the heating working overtime though.

 

[ciaran00]

Hey U_K... you know that you were missing mind flayer in v4? Just checking...

ciaran

 

[kreynolds]

Note that none of the Revised CRs use this rule.

Oh, I didn't need it for your CRs. I needed it for mine.

 

[kreynolds]

Hey U_K... you know that you were missing mind flayer in v4? Just checking...

I can't tell if this is a joke or not, but if it is, it's cute.

 

[ciaran00]

hoo.