DracoSuave
First Post
The long jump doesn't allow you to add 1.33X your height in order to determine reach for climbing.
So, if you're 6 feet tall, your total reach with a vertical jump is 8 + Athletics Check / 5 (or 10).
If you roll a 20, that means a total reached height of 12 feet, which will allow you to climb to clear that obstacle.
The long jump only gives you 5 feet with that same roll. Not only that, it doesn't allow you to add vertical movement--if you don't clear the entire obstacle, your motion ends before the obstacle.
In order for the long jump to be advantageous in this situation, you need to roll... hmm...
x/4 > x/5 + 4h/3
15x > 12x + 80h
3x > 80h
x > 80h/3
x > 26.6h
So, if you are one foot tall, long jump is better for height than high jump if you can roll a 27 on your athletics check.
At 5 feet tall, however, you need to be rolling considerably more.
So, if you're 6 feet tall, your total reach with a vertical jump is 8 + Athletics Check / 5 (or 10).
If you roll a 20, that means a total reached height of 12 feet, which will allow you to climb to clear that obstacle.
The long jump only gives you 5 feet with that same roll. Not only that, it doesn't allow you to add vertical movement--if you don't clear the entire obstacle, your motion ends before the obstacle.
In order for the long jump to be advantageous in this situation, you need to roll... hmm...
x/4 > x/5 + 4h/3
15x > 12x + 80h
3x > 80h
x > 80h/3
x > 26.6h
So, if you are one foot tall, long jump is better for height than high jump if you can roll a 27 on your athletics check.
At 5 feet tall, however, you need to be rolling considerably more.