What 3e (& 3.5e) terms are you sick of?

[333 Dave]

Sorry gamecat, I don't think I am qualified to be an Iconic Whiner. I don't wine all that much. Just in threads like this.
Oh, and Chaozu, I forgot about you, but your thing definatly contributed to me snapping. THERE AREN"T ENOUGH CLOWN MIDGETS FOR YOU TO BE ICONIC! Now why don't you go use your super-powerfull blow yourself up move?
(just kidding, this whole thing is tounge in cheek. I'm not this big of an . Honest)

 

[Saint Brendan]

I am sick of 3.5.

By the way, if it is the next version of 3e, shouldn't it be 3.1, anyways?

I suggest 3e++ instead.

 

[Gez]

I am sick of 3.5.

By the way, if it is the next version of 3e, shouldn't it be 3.1, anyways?

I suggest 3e++ instead.

From First Revision Spotlight

Q: I'm nervous about the label "3.5." It implies that this upgrade will move us halfway toward a completely new version 4.0. Why was this number chosen, as opposed to 3.01 or 3.1?

A: We actually talked about this quite a bit. We feel the changes we're making to the D&D RPG are important enough to warrant the "3.5" label, but not nearly significant enough to be a 4th edition. We also want to send the message that this is an upgrade, not a new edition. Whether we're "halfway" to a new edition, I couldn't say. I will say that I would have a hard time backing any upgrade beyond this that wasn't a new edition. A "3.1" label might imply there could be a bunch more upgrades before 4.0, and we don't want to imply that at all.