Just_Hal said:
I would have to say CG for House due to what the other poster stated, he will do by whatever means needed save his patient.
However, he is almost always doing it for completely selfish reasons. He only takes cases that interest him as
puzzles. He tries incredibly hard to save a patients life because, once he takes a case, he consider it an affront to fail. If he doesn't take a case, he's completely capable of not caring.
I disagree with those who say "he doesn't fit well in the D&D alignment system." I think he's the perfect example of Chaotic Neutral. He might have a slight tendancy for good. The "evil" you see from him is almost always lack of concern, rather than actively trying to do evil. At times, you see some humanity and he'll try to do good. A few good acts do not make someone good.
He is clearly Chaotic. He
actively defies authority. In fact, he has made many decisions solely to defy authority (especially in the first season).
ThirdWizard said:
What about Chase's behavior when they were doing the arc with the guy who donated money? He turned on House and made deals with the guy so that he couldn't be fired, taking evidence about House's behavior to him in order to procure favor so that he could have job security because he feared House would get rid of him first. I'd go NE during that. He's mellowed out since, but he's shown that if the situation calls for it, he's willing to scheme against his fellows.
That's not evil to me. I think it's clearly neutral behavior. Chase is the hardest to classify, IMO. Of Chase, House and him, I think he's the closest to good. He has strong opinions about certain things (obese people, for one), and unpopular ones. However, he clearly has good leanings (went to seminary school, but failed his "test of faith").