D&D (2024) What are the chances they will fix the index in the new books?

[A2Z]

Because the PHB index is about the worst thing I've ever had to use

 

[delericho]

Probably very high - they're well aware of the issues people have with the 2014 indices, so I'm sure they'll make sure to do these right.

I may, of course, be forced to eat those words.

 

[Jefe Bergenstein]

Pet peeve is running into something like "Attack of Opportunity.... See Opportunity Attack"

There's probably a good reason, just from a non-editor perspective it seems that simply putting the page number there is less ink lol.

 

[aco175]

In order to keep with the backwards-compatible idea, they need to make the new ones just as random.

 

[edosan]

Pet peeve is running into something like "Attack of Opportunity.... See Opportunity Attack"

There's probably a good reason, just from a non-editor perspective it seems that simply putting the page number there is less ink lol.

Yeah, I'm not an editor but I imagine "Attack of Opportunity, page 234" would have been easier

 

[mellored]

They mentioned they would in the latest video.

 

[Mistwell]

Because the PHB index is about the worst thing I've ever had to use

I vaguely recall them saying they would in a very early mention by Crawford?

 

[Parmandur]

Well, the book is being significantly reorganized, so they couldn't keep the old one.

 

[Horwath]

Or spell description sorted by spell level, then by alphabet.

I.E.
Cantrips:
A-Z
1st level spells:
A-Z
...
...

 

[Sorcerers Apprentice]

Pet peeve is running into something like "Attack of Opportunity.... See Opportunity Attack"

Followed by "Opportunity Attack... See Reaction, Opportunity Attack"