johnsemlak
First Post
Straight question.
If a creature is just underwater, but completely submerged, is there a rule on the cover bonus?
If a creature is just underwater, but completely submerged, is there a rule on the cover bonus?
Yes (pg.93) of the DMG. A completely submerged creature has total cover. Magical effects are unaffected except for those which require attack rolls or are fire-based (the surface of a body of water blocks line of effect for fire-based spells and there are a few other details on that page).johnsemlak said:Straight question.
If a creature is just underwater, but completely submerged, is there a rule on the cover bonus?
shilsen said:A completely submerged creature has total cover.
Thanee said:Wow, I guess fishing is a tough job in D&D then...
Bye
Thanee
Dr. Awkward said:How thick does the water have to be before I'm immersed. Would you argue that if I were to encase myself in a bubble of lava 1 cm thick I wouldn't take 20d6 damage each round?
Ogrork the Mighty said:We're not talking about lava, we're talking about water. We have no rules for lava immersion (other than damage). Bad analogy.
Immersion means you are completely surrounded by it, with no open spaces. When someone is in a bubble, they are not immersed in water. They may be surrounded by water, but they're not immersed in it. If I surround you with a bubble of water, you're not wet. If I immerse you in water, you are.
I'm assuming you're being sarcastic in your original post b/c I find it hard to believe someone would think 1 cm of water protects you from attacks...