Scribe
Legend
That's a different issue though, but you do you.Why do people continue to tell me this like I don't know it?
That's a different issue though, but you do you.Why do people continue to tell me this like I don't know it?
Honestly, I'm more interested in a "less is more" approach. I'm getting pretty bored with the Kitchen Sink campaign settings that strain to include literally everything imaginable. Castles and swords and robots and dragons and lasers and cannons and zombie space pirate ninjas because "WoAh AnYtHiNg CaN hApPeN hErE!" doesn't really interest me. We already have Eberron, we already have Wildemount.
I would much prefer a new world that is carefully tailored to fit a theme, and is identifiable as much by what isn't included as what is. I'd be very interested in a campaign setting that is based on the lore and mythology of Welsh mythology and legend, for example, but only if it stays true to the theme. If I see warforged and samurai, I'm putting it down and walking away.
Maybe I'm just too picky.
I'll grant you that.I now own a few setting books; Eberron, Wildemount, Theros, and Ravenloft.
IMO, the Ravenloft book is by far the best. And I know a lot of folks don't like it, but damn their opinions, it's one of the best books 5E has published.
And I'll put the emphasis on the word book. Is it the best setting book? I don't know, and I don't really care. But Van Richten's Guide is simply a book that hammers in hard on the genre of D&D, but with horror too! It's simply fantastic at it. It's not Call of Cthulhu, or Vampire: the Masquerade. It's still D&D, but it's D&D for heroes trapped in a terrifying world (or variety of worlds, for any horror taste).
I wouldn't say Ravenloft is the best book at detailing the setting. But it is the best book at defining a genre of D&D, and for that reason, I want more books done in its model.
I'll grant you that.
It's less a setting book and more of a Horror Toolkit Handbook. Rather than a straight Hammer Horror setting. In that way I find it somewhat compelling and quite useful. I mean, I'd still argue that there are much better games in which to do, say, cosmic or body horror in games than 5e, but it's nice to have all the same. I think the format they used for Nu-Ravenloft would work well with new settings that are built on a theme. Like say, a sort of high level handbook baked into a demigod setting or something.
As a straight setting book for an older world it suffers though.
Cool!Nowadays, when I'm looking for a setting outside of "Generic D&D-land" (looking at you, FR) I'm more likely to go with something that really feels totally unique, and even puts strain on the D&D system. I'm very likely to run the Enemy Within Campaign for WHFRP as my next campaign, converted to 5E, and it serves as an example for how new "setting books"... probably aren't really that appealing to me much anymore.
Yeah, probably. I don't own either, but they are clearly departures from more traditional fare. I mean, if you look at the roster of 5E settings, they present a nice diversity already, so I think I'm merely stating what they're already doing.Isn't that what they did with Strixhaven & Witchlight? At least marginally? Genuine question based on what little hearsay I've read.
Cool!
I know there was a whole thread on that recently. Please do report on that whenever you end up doing that, as I want to see how that works out.
As an old time WFRP stan it's anathema to me personally to try, but as long as others are committing the heresy, I'm here for it.
And this is exactly why I think D&D 5e is overdue for an Urban Fantasy setting (no, Ravnica doesn't count), and a Prehistoric one.