Krishnath said:Trying to get the thread back on track? Bad knightfall, bad, bad knightfall
Nice template combos though.![]()
BOZ said:ah, many of those D&D classics.![]()
shivamuffin said:Hey Krish! Hey all!
A rogue in the group wanted to use his fists as his primary weapon. So he took Unarmed Strike as a feet. I ruled that 2 fists are a natural attack for humanoids ( Humans, orcs, and such ), so there were no attack penalties for using fists as weapons if one had Unarmed Strike. It's been interesting so far.
If 2 fists are a natural attack, then do monks get three attacks with their flurry of blows? I never understood why humans and 2 fists would not be considered natural attacks. Like a trolls 2 claws.
shivamuffin said:If a rogue Tumbles behind an opponent, does he get a sneak attack? I know they get it for flanking, and being invisible.
shivamuffin said:The Tumble DCs are too high. I changed it to DC 15 around, and 20 to Tumble through. Is that bad? It's the only thing in combat that can save a rogue's ass.
I have no idea, but if it works for your group, go with it.shivamuffin said:Did 3.5 dump the Refocus option for initiative? I brought it back, is that bad? and why, if it is?

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.