myrdden
First Post
Re: Re: What is 'Enterprise' missing?
That is one of the reasons it feels more like the later series than TOS (although they didn't have seatbelts either!) to me. I agree with what you have posted - the tech level needs to be more evolved from the present. It needs to be recognizable yet feel advanced. It sure is a challenge, but then that's the price for creating an ambitious series like Star Trek.
For fans of the show, its not ONLY good storylines that is necessary. Part of the fun is seeing the special effects and technology portrayed in a realistic or plausible manner. I own a couple of the technical manuals simply because it is fun to speculate and think about the technology of the show. One of the draws of this show for me was the anticipation of seeing pre-TOS technology and watch how things developed. So far - I haven't been satisfied on this point.
Myrdden
Mark CMG said:I do not care if it shows up in later series in their chronology or if basic common sense safety precautions have been ignored for those same later series. If they want this series to seem more real and pertinent to our own times then let's get with the program and buckle the hell up!
That is one of the reasons it feels more like the later series than TOS (although they didn't have seatbelts either!) to me. I agree with what you have posted - the tech level needs to be more evolved from the present. It needs to be recognizable yet feel advanced. It sure is a challenge, but then that's the price for creating an ambitious series like Star Trek.
For fans of the show, its not ONLY good storylines that is necessary. Part of the fun is seeing the special effects and technology portrayed in a realistic or plausible manner. I own a couple of the technical manuals simply because it is fun to speculate and think about the technology of the show. One of the draws of this show for me was the anticipation of seeing pre-TOS technology and watch how things developed. So far - I haven't been satisfied on this point.
Myrdden