hawkeyefan
Legend
I'm not the one calling their understanding of someone else's preferences perverse.
I don’t think that’s quite what was said… but either way, you’re judging other playstyles just as much as anyone else is.
I'm not the one calling their understanding of someone else's preferences perverse.
I present my opinion as subjective. What you're suggesting is that I should post about what I think, whether I present it as opinion or not.I don’t think that’s quite what was said… but either way, you’re judging other playstyles just as much as anyone else is.
I present my opinion as subjective. What you're suggesting is that I should post about what I think, whether I present it as opinion or not.
Yea, I have run a V;tM game. I have run another campaign of Vampire for eighteen players (fun, but ugh! and never again). It still didn't run that way. But to each their own. I would love to see video of a session that does this (as I have never seen one in play).It's not that uncommon. From personal experience, it was way more common in V:tM circles than in D&D. And not in "supers with fangs" VtM games, more in Anne Rice heavy inspired games. I've played sessions like that, where all convos where in character, first person. Those were games where we would have multiple sessions without ever touching dices. But beside me, everyone else in that group also loved Mind's Eye Theater and was very into Vampire LARP.