Quasqueton
First Post
I was at my local game store, picking up some minis. Another gamer was in the store and a conversation about playing D&D came up.
He told me about how a paladin of his, from a past campaign, lost his paladinhood by accidentally cutting the throat of an orc prisoner.
"How do you 'accidentally' cut a prisoner's throat?" I asked.
He explained:
He wanted to get info from this captive, and so proceeded to threaten the orc with death. He put a knife to the orc's neck and intimidated him into giving the info. (He rationalized this action with "good end justifies the means". But this is seperate from my story here. . . )
When the intimidation/interrogation was over, he said to the DM, "I pull the knife away from the orc's neck." Since he didn't detail that he was taking the knife "back" (laterally) from the orc's neck first, the DM ruled that the paladin just yanked back the blade. He rolled whatever percentage chance he determined appropriate, and it came up that the blade sliced the orc's artery. So the orc bled to death. The paladin's god was angered. And so on.
I commented on that being a dirty trick for a DM to pull. "Do you have a chance to cut yourself while cleaning your sword?" I asked.
But the player apparently thought the ruling was fine, because he "expained" the situation and process to me. He even demonstrated holding an invisible knife to my neck, then pulled it away without backing it away to the side first.
The player then added that the DM felt paladins should be held to a much higher standard than other classes, else they are too powerful.
<shakes head>
Quasqueton
He told me about how a paladin of his, from a past campaign, lost his paladinhood by accidentally cutting the throat of an orc prisoner.
"How do you 'accidentally' cut a prisoner's throat?" I asked.
He explained:
He wanted to get info from this captive, and so proceeded to threaten the orc with death. He put a knife to the orc's neck and intimidated him into giving the info. (He rationalized this action with "good end justifies the means". But this is seperate from my story here. . . )
When the intimidation/interrogation was over, he said to the DM, "I pull the knife away from the orc's neck." Since he didn't detail that he was taking the knife "back" (laterally) from the orc's neck first, the DM ruled that the paladin just yanked back the blade. He rolled whatever percentage chance he determined appropriate, and it came up that the blade sliced the orc's artery. So the orc bled to death. The paladin's god was angered. And so on.
I commented on that being a dirty trick for a DM to pull. "Do you have a chance to cut yourself while cleaning your sword?" I asked.
But the player apparently thought the ruling was fine, because he "expained" the situation and process to me. He even demonstrated holding an invisible knife to my neck, then pulled it away without backing it away to the side first.
The player then added that the DM felt paladins should be held to a much higher standard than other classes, else they are too powerful.
<shakes head>
Quasqueton