was
Adventurer
I enjoy playing characters the skill monkey with a wide range of abilities. I usually favor Dex and Acrobatics over Str and Athletics - possibly because of some deep-steated personal bias against jocks. I also find it difficult to play unintelligent/uneducated characters, so all of mine tend to have a decent Intelligence and as many knowledge skills as I can squeeze in. I also tend to play rogues (or characters with rogue levels), so I've always got Stealth trained, although not always Sleight of Hand, as I prefer not to play actual thieves. I usually don't go for the party face role, so I tend not to invest heavily in social skills. I think I'd like to try that out this time, though.
That all might be why I find the "big dumb tank" concept unappealing.
...I also enjoy playing stealthy characters, mainly rangers and rogues. But from time to time, depending upon the party's needs, I have played tanks. None of them have ever been "big dumb tanks". Most of the time, they are experts in combat strategy. They tactically manage the battlefield with the goal of protecting their comrades and ensuring that they have the opportunity to use their offensive capabilities to best effect.
...IME, playing a tank is not about merely being a two-legged shield. It's about playing tactically and being dedicated to the party. Next to a well-played cleric, a good tank is probably the most selfless character in the party. The one who sticks by other members when they're in trouble. The one who doesn't cut and run when things start going bad. The one who covers the retreat of his comrades-in-arms. IMO, selfless actions do not necessarily equate with stupidity.
...If you don't like the concept of a "big dumb tank", try playing a tank that that isn't one. Don't let your real world experiences/biases limit your own imagination. Tanks are like any other class, they are only limited by the creativity of the person playing them.
Last edited: