Zarithar Savageclaw
First Post
Sir Brennen said:There's also the persistant rumor that Elric of Melnibone will see the silver screen someday...
Now that... would quite simply rock!
Sir Brennen said:There's also the persistant rumor that Elric of Melnibone will see the silver screen someday...
I'm a big fan of Robert E. Howard's Conan stories (I read them all on a yearly basis, sometimes more often in the case of my favorite few tales such as The People of the Black Circle or The Hour of the Dragon), but I still loved Milius' film despite the many differences from the stories. I actually approved of the changes that Milius made to Conan's background, because in the original stories Conan's past was never really examined in depth (basically, he was a young barbarian who wandered into Zamora and became a thief). Milius' film had an interesting progression from orphaned slave, to champion gladiator, to thief and adventurer. True to the stories? Not really, but it was cool as part of a seperate Conan continuity.Swoop109 said:Don't get me wrong. I think CtB is The best sword and sorcery film made in the 80's. I just happen to think that it is a badly done Conan film.
The entire character background was re-written and Arnold and Milius failed to capture any of the granduer of the original materiaal.
They could have changed the name of the title character to Ator and it would not have affected the film one bit.
No, it had nothing to do with the character of Conan himself IMO, or even the character of the Hyborian setting, really, other tossing in a few Hyborian names. And it's only the names, too, I might add. The character of Conan is completely rewritten from REH and has very little in common with Conan, other than the name and the fact that he's a "barbarian" from the northish country. And as to how "believable" the arms and armor are, that's certainly relative--I didn't find them particularly believable.Zarithar Savageclaw said:Actually compared to Conan the Destroyer (which sucked monkey balls), the first film had quite a bit to do with the original character. Many of the Hyperborean countries and kingdoms were represented, and the arms and armor worn by the characters were believable and not ridiculous as was the case with the second film.
Yes, this.Swoop109 said:Don't get me wrong. I think CtB is The best sword and sorcery film made in the 80's. I just happen to think that it is a badly done Conan film.
Like that one snake trainer's hammer?Zarithar Savageclaw said:and the arms and armor worn by the characters were believable and not ridiculous as was the case with the second film.
I have my doubts about an Elric movie. How do you capture all that narrative, all the weird chaos and happenings, in a film? Seems to me a project beyond the scope of film. I've been plenty wrong about film adaptations of fantasy material before, but Elric seems particularly resistant to translation, I think, or perhaps that it feels like it would be more in danger of falling on its face really, really badly.Zarithar Savageclaw said:Now that...would quite simply rock!
Joshua Dyal said:No, it had nothing to do with the character of Conan himself IMO, or even the character of the Hyborian setting, really, other tossing in a few Hyborian names. And it's only the names, too, I might add. The character of Conan is completely rewritten from REH and has very little in common with Conan, other than the name and the fact that he's a "barbarian" from the northish country. And as to how "believable" the arms and armor are, that's certainly relative--I didn't find them particularly believable.
Joshua Dyal said:No, it had nothing to do with the character of Conan himself IMO, or even the character of the Hyborian setting, really, other tossing in a few Hyborian names. And it's only the names, too, I might add. The character of Conan is completely rewritten from REH and has very little in common with Conan, other than the name and the fact that he's a "barbarian" from the northish country. And as to how "believable" the arms and armor are, that's certainly relative--I didn't find them particularly believable.
That line is great. There are so many places in life where you could use it.Warrior Poet said:If only you spoke Jovitos.
True. And in a just world, Conan the Destroyer would be dragged out to the woods and mercifully euthanized along with the second Highlander movie, if such an abomination were to actually exist, which it doesn't, thankfully, and now we shall never speak of this again.Zarithar Savageclaw said:Conan the Barbarian, which was a more serious take on the story, than Conan the Destroyer.
That movie is a wellspring of great lines that have application in multiple areas of life:Joshua Dyal said:That line is great. There are so many places in life where you could use it.