• The VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX is LIVE! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!

What's All This About The OGL Going Away?

This last week I've seen videos, tweets, and articles all repeating an unsourced rumour that the OGL (Open Gaming License) will be going away with the advent of OneD&D, and that third party publishers would have no way of legally creating compatible material. I wanted to write an article clarifying some of these terms. I've seen articles claiming (and I quote) that "players would be unable...

This last week I've seen videos, tweets, and articles all repeating an unsourced rumour that the OGL (Open Gaming License) will be going away with the advent of OneD&D, and that third party publishers would have no way of legally creating compatible material. I wanted to write an article clarifying some of these terms.


I've seen articles claiming (and I quote) that "players would be unable to legally publish homebrew content" and that WotC may be "outlawing third-party homebrew content". These claims need clarification.

What's the Open Gaming License? It was created by WotC about 20 years ago; it's analagous to various 'open source' licenses. There isn't a '5E OGL' or a '3E OGL' and there won't be a 'OneD&D OGL' -- there's just the OGL (technically there are two versions, but that's by-the-by). The OGL is non-rescindable -- it can't be cancelled or revoked. Any content released as Open Gaming Content (OGC) under that license -- which includes the D&D 3E SRD, the 5E SRD, Pathfinder's SRD, Level Up's SRD, and thousands and thousands of third party books -- remains OGC forever, available for use under the license. Genie, bottle, and all that.

So, the OGL can't 'go away'. It's been here for 20 years and it's here to stay. This was WotC's (and OGL architect Ryan Dancey's) intention when they created it 20 years ago, to ensure that D&D would forever be available no matter what happened to its parent company.

What's an SRD? A System Reference Document (SRD) contains Open Gaming Content (OGC). Anything in the 3E SRD, the 3.5 SRD, or the 5E SRD, etc., is designated forever as OGC (Open Gaming Content). Each of those SRDs contains large quantities of material, including the core rules of the respective games, and encompasses all the core terminology of the ruleset(s).

When people say 'the OGL is going away' what they probably mean to say is that there won't be a new OneD&D System Reference Document.

Does That Matter? OneD&D will be -- allegedly -- fully compatible with 5E. That means it uses all the same terminology. Armor Class, Hit Points, Warlock, Pit Fiend, and so on. All this terminology has been OGC for 20 years, and anybody can use it under the terms of the OGL. The only way it could be difficult for third parties to make compatible material for OneD&D is if OneD&D substantially changed the core terminology of the game, but at that point OneD&D would no longer be compatible with 5E (or, arguably, would even be recognizable as D&D). So the ability to create compatible third party material won't be going away.

However! There is one exception -- if your use of OneD&D material needs you to replicate OneD&D content, as opposed to simply be compatible with it (say you're making an app which has all the spell descriptions in it) and if there is no new SRD, then you won't be able to do that. You can make compatible stuff ("The evil necromancer can cast magic missile" -- the term magic missile has been OGL for two decades) but you wouldn't be able to replicate the full descriptive text of the OneD&D version of the spell. That's a big if -- if there's no new SRD.

So you'd still be able to make compatible adventures and settings and new spells and new monsters and new magic items and new feats and new rules and stuff. All the stuff 3PPs commonly do. You just wouldn't be able to reproduce the core rules content itself. However, I've been publishing material for 3E, 3.5, 4E, 5E, and Pathfinder 1E for 20 years, and the need to reproduce core rules content hasn't often come up for us -- we produce new compatible content. But if you're making an app, or spell cards, or something which needs to reproduce content from the rulebooks, you'd need an SRD to do that.

So yep. If no SRD, compatible = yes, directly reproduce = no (of course, you can indirectly reproduce stuff by rewriting it in your own words).

Branding! Using the OGL you can't use the term "Dungeons & Dragons" (you never could). Most third parties say something like "compatible with the world's most popular roleplaying game" and have some sort of '5E' logo of their own making on the cover. Something similar will no doubt happen with OneD&D -- the third party market will create terminology to indicate compatibility. (Back in the 3E days, WotC provided a logo for this use called the 'd20 System Trademark Logo' but they don't do that any more).

What if WotC didn't 'support' third party material? As discussed, nobody can take the OGL or any existing OGC away. However, WotC does have control over DMs Guild and integration with D&D Beyond or the virtual tabletop app they're making. So while they can't stop folks from making and publishing compatible stuff, they could make it harder to distribute simply by not allowing it on those three platforms. If OneD&D becomes heavily reliant on a specific platform we might find ourselves in the same situation we had in 4E, where it was harder to sell player options simply because they weren't on the official character builder app. It's not that you couldn't publish 4E player options, it's just that many players weren't interested in them if they couldn't use them in the app.

But copyright! Yes, yes, you can't copyright rules, you can't do this, you can't do that. The OGL is not relevant to copyright law -- it is a license, an agreement, a contract. By using it you agree to its terms. Sure WotC might not be able to copyright X, but you can certainly contractually agree not to use X (which is a selection of material designated as 'Product Identity') by using the license. There are arguments on the validity of this from actual real lawyers which I won't get into, but I just wanted to note that this is about a license, not copyright law.

If you don't use the Open Gaming License, of course, it doesn't apply to you. You are only bound by a license you use. So then, sure, knock yourself out with copyright law!

So, bullet point summary:
  • The OGL can't go away, and any existing OGC can't go away
  • If (that's an if) there is no new SRD, you will be able to still make compatible material but not reproduce the OneD&D content
  • Most of the D&D terminology (save a few terms like 'beholder' etc.) has been OGC for 20 years and is freely available for use
  • To render that existing OGC unusable for OneD&D the basic terminology of the entire game would have to be changed, at which point it would no longer be compatible with 5E.

log in or register to remove this ad


Mod Squad
Staff member
There are quite a lot of things that they would never be able to actually make anybody pay up for, because game mechanics (as distinct from the specific creative expression of them) can't be copyrighted.

With respect, you seem to misunderstand the real purpose of the OGL.

The OGL gives you safe harbor - if you follow the OGL, you have no worries about WotC in court.

As someone else noted - there is no clear "bright line" over what, exactly, is copyright IP and what isn't in the game. So, without the OGL, you are apt to go to court to find where that line is for your product.

WotC is a billion-dollar company. If you are not of similar class, going to court with WotC is not a thing you want to do. They have more money than you - they will tie up your product for years, and make you bleed legal fees out the ears until the issue is resolved - likely by you settling because you cannot afford to defend yourself.

You don't want to do that. WotC doesn't actually want to do that. So, the OGL is an agreement so nobody has to do that.

log in or register to remove this ad

You know, I still don't understand how Solasta wasn't covered by the OGL?

Was it just that nobody want to fight it out in court to prove it?

WotC got in real quick and made an agreement with them when it was clear the KS was going to succeed (I mean, to be clear we dunno if they contacted WotC or vice-versa).

Thus any potential lawsuit or other issues was forestalled. Which is basically a win for both sides, but less for people who wondered what would happen lol.

Micah Sweet

Level Up & OSR Enthusiast
Which, for those who haven't looked, says:

"9. Updating the License: Wizards or its designated Agents may publish updated versions of this License. You may use any authorized version of this License to copy, modify and distribute any Open Game Content originally distributed under any version of this License."

Which means, any content released under v1.0 or 1.0a may be perpetually used under those licenses. Basically, 3e and 5e are perpetually as open as they are today.
So the OGL 1.1 seems to be completely ignorable? Why would anyone sign onto it then?


The EN World kitten
So the OGL 1.1 seems to be completely ignorable? Why would anyone sign onto it then?
Based purely on what we've been told, there's very little reason to do so. Hence speculation (on my part and others') that WotC will roll out incentives to try and entice third-party publishers to use the newer version of the license. What such hypothetical incentives will be are, well, hypothetical, but everything from a separate license to use a compatibility logo (a la the old d20 STL) to letting third-party publishers put material on D&D Beyond only if they use the OGL v1.1 have been floated.
Last edited:

so if I do a kickstarter for $60,000 (first I am celebrating, then I am telling everyone I know) but do I have to give my 'company' financials to WotC? I don't know law, or art, or computer stuff but BOY do I know finance, and I can tell you a lot of small businesses that are in no way shape or form 'making money'. Heck in the example above I could EASILY see a $60,000 kickstarter breaking even or turning a SUPER small profit (like enough to buy a new book)

This is also useing 'income' when there are two types (well more but this is the barebones one) is that revenue/profit?

Also for 1D&D big companies will be paying royalties?!?!?!

Voidrunner's Codex

Remove ads

Voidrunner's Codex

Remove ads