Driddle said:I wonder if this was one of those decisions of "change for the sake of change?" Gotta make sure 4th edition looks different from the previous product, otherwise why would consumers even look at it, eh?
Driddle said:It feels as though WotC has decided that unless a character is designed specifically to wade through combat, it's not worth the time to play.
PeterWeller said:It feels more like WotC has decided that they won't release any class until it can actually do something in a fight.
The bard is a great archetype (once you decide which archetype you're using: jack of all trades? inspirational minstrel? erudite scoundrel?), but sadly, it doesn't point to any obvious fighting ability, and in D&D, which is, whether you like it or not, a combat heavy game, the poor bard ends up feeling left out a lot.
There's not enough to support different musical classes, really when you take the terms Minstrel, Skald, Gandharva and Ngoma, they generally refer to just bards.DreamChaser said:Interestingly, the cover of the 4e players handbook (http://www.enworld.org/images/4e/phb.jpg) says Player's Handbook: Arcane, Divine, and Martial Heroes
While this may seem obvious, I would expect that the bard, if it ever comes along, would need to come along with a new power source (or in another type of book) because it seems that each Player's Handbook would focus on another set of hero types.
So,
[PURE SPECULATION]
Player's Handbook: Musical, Natural, and Psionic Heroes might be in the offing next.
[/PURE SPECULATION]
DC