• NOW LIVE! Into the Woods--new character species, eerie monsters, and haunting villains to populate the woodlands of your D&D games.

What's with the big books?

jester47

First Post
Has anyone else noticed that there are some sizable d20 products out there? Some of these are getting ludicrous. Namely Oathbound and Book of the Righteous. Oathbound has more pages, but BotR has a bigger bond so it seems bigger. But there things are HUGE! Does WotC not share who the binder is? Why is FRCS thinner than both of these with the same number of pages? Cost cutting?

If a book is really big and really specialised it is a sure bet that I probably am not going to buy it. Even if it has somthing useful. I think d20 is getting to the point where you really have to mine for stuff. Anyways, I am running out of room, so publishers, lets make 1 inch the gentlemans agreement on thickness form here out, OK?

Aaron.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Thicker books are better books. I perfer the thick tomes to the little pamphlets. I have no trouble finding things in well organized books. And books are becoming better and better organized. It's great. :)
 

Admittedly I was amazed at the thickness, but then I just shrugged and skimmed the books. I enjoyed them, that's what matters! :)
 



jester47 said:
If a book is really big and really specialised it is a sure bet that I probably am not going to buy it. Even if it has somthing useful.

Do you mean that you won't buy it because you don't have room to shelve it, or because you just don't like thick books?

Personally, I'm more interested in the usefulness of the content than the thickness of the book. And you know they say size doesn't matter.
biggrinbounce2.gif
 

For the most part, though it seems the big books are the quality books. I'm more inclined to take a chanvce at a good looking big book then a smaller one.
 




Into the Woods

Remove ads

Top