Zaister said:I don't think she looks all that different from the female githyanki that was pictured in the 3.0 Planar Handbook or the 3.5 Monster Manual.
Thought the same thing. This image does not seem to be a new view of the githyanki.
Zaister said:I don't think she looks all that different from the female githyanki that was pictured in the 3.0 Planar Handbook or the 3.5 Monster Manual.
The legs are easily twice as full (and toned), the brow is less pronounced, the chin is more rounded, the lips are fuller and slightly parted, the facial wraps were removed to reveal the face, the... rear area, as it were... is of Brazilian proportions and her torso and abdomen are within healthy human standards (as opposed to the malnourished one from 3e).Zaister said:I don't think she looks all that different from the female githyanki that was pictured in the 3.0 Planar Handbook or the 3.5 Monster Manual.
jaer said:Thought the same thing. This image does not seem to be a new view of the githyanki.
I think she's pretty sexy, for a gaunt, knobby-jointed, mottled, nearly noseless humanoid.Cmarco said:You and I must have a great difference of opinion on what is considered "sexy".![]()
He's supposed to be an angel.Imban said:Speaking of that, what's Captain No-Mouth two to the right of her supposed to be?