• NOW LIVE! Into the Woods--new character species, eerie monsters, and haunting villains to populate the woodlands of your D&D games.

What's with the sexy githyanki?


log in or register to remove this ad

Zaister said:
I don't think she looks all that different from the female githyanki that was pictured in the 3.0 Planar Handbook or the 3.5 Monster Manual.
The legs are easily twice as full (and toned), the brow is less pronounced, the chin is more rounded, the lips are fuller and slightly parted, the facial wraps were removed to reveal the face, the... rear area, as it were... is of Brazilian proportions and her torso and abdomen are within healthy human standards (as opposed to the malnourished one from 3e).
 


The 4e githyanki did get prettified and softened a bit, definitely a sex up on 3e. I actually found the 3e githyanki sexy though. Does that mean I'm sick? You what they say - you can never be too rich or too thin.
 


Doug McCrae said:
The 4e githyanki did get prettified and softened a bit, definitely a sex up on 3e. I actually found the 3e githyanki sexy though. Does that mean I'm sick? You what they say - you can never be too rich or too thin.
This one?
 


Hmm, while the W&M wallpaper's Githyanki is certainly, uh, sexier than the PsiHB one, we're more or less talking about individual specimens and art pieces here. I don't really see any differences between the PsiHB and W&M Githyanki that would lead me to believe overarching changes to the look of the race had been put into place, just that they'd chosen a slightly more attractive artwork for them.

Speaking of that, what's Captain No-Mouth two to the right of her supposed to be?
 


I'm a Gith lover...but that picture does nothing for me...

probably because it is a red head. I just don't find red heads sexy.
 

Into the Woods

Remove ads

Top