• The VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!

TSR When Random House Sued TSR For $9.5M

Benjamin Riggs is continuing to talk about his research into the history of TSR. He recounts here a tale of TSR's accounting practices which contributed to their eventual demise.

Benjamin Riggs is continuing to talk about his research into the history of TSR. He recounts here a tale of TSR's accounting practices which contributed to their eventual demise.

Check out Ben's Plot Points podcast

In April of 1996, Random House sued TSR for lack of payment on an $9.5 million loan.

You may ask yourself how TSR came to owe its distributor such a large sum of money. The answer lies in the 1979 distribution agreement between Random House and TSR, in which Random House became TSR's exclusive avenue into the book trade. In that agreement, signed by Gygax himself, Random House agreed to advance TSR 27.3% of the retail value of their product upon receipt. Random House could also return the product to TSR for a refund. All this meant that TSR could produce cash by shipping to Random House instead of waiting for actual customers to purchase their products.

The arrangement seems bizarre, but Jim Fallone, a TSR alum familiar with the agreement, said there may be an excellent reason for it. TSR's books were beautiful, and therefore expensive. Also, TSR had a back catalog that sold well. Sometimes, TSR faced a choice between printing new material, and reprinting old material that sold well, but might take time to make a return on printing costs. The Random House agreement was a way around this problem. TSR could print and ship new copies of the Player's Handbook knowing that they would get paid for it soon, and then also afford to print new material.

According to Fallone, the math on all this works out fine, so long as no more than 20% of TSR's products are returned. But in the 90's, TSR's many forays into creating new game worlds increased their levels of returns to more like 30%. At the same time, TSR began overprinting products. DragonStrike, for example, was a hit game that was driven into the red by overprinting. The game sold 100,000 copies, and had reorders for 50,000 more. Management, however, decided to print 150,000 copies of the game, which never sold.

Also, TSR began to use Random House to generate ready cash. Fallone said that TSR began to “abuse the loan aspect of the contract by shipping product to Random House that there is no actual sales demand for just to generate the advance payment in order to cover printing debts then you pour gasoline on the fire."
These practices helped cause TSR's near bankruptcy in 1997.

Thanks to historian Michael Calleia for providing me with a copy of the 1996 lawsuit and 1979 contract.

If you're interested, I talk to TSR alums Jim Lowder and John Rateliff here about the contract. "A 1979 contract between Random House and TSR would take 18 years to kill the company that started the role-playing game hobby. Thanks to historian Micheal Calleia, Ben has a copy of that very contract, and discusses how it led TSR to near bankruptcy in 1997 with TSR alums James Lowder, Chaosium’s executive editor, and John Rateliff, an internationally renowned Tolkien scholar."

log in or register to remove this ad


Kobold Enthusiast
Another edition of Business Wile E. Coyote. Someone will find a way to hang the company if good practice isn't enforced throughout all financial and contractual dealings. Reminds me of several 90s tech companies that got complacent with temporary market dominance while putting MBA folks in charge of their prototype divisions.

An operating cash spigot is a dangerous thing.


I dont remember where I read this but I recall someone from TSR saying that they began adding superfluous components to boxed sets such as the Dark Sun flip books (as an example) which significantly drove up printing costs which they ignored and continued to do. This had an affect on the bottom line and contributed to their bankruptcy as well.


Oof. So, to be technically correct:*

TSR: 1974-1997.
WOTC: 1997-1999.
Hasbro: 1999-2019.

TSR: 24 Years.
WOTC: 3 Years.
Hasbro: 21 Years.

So by the 50th anniversary, yes, GI JOE will be more important to D&D than the Gygax/Williams lineage. ahem.

*The BEST KIND of correct! :)

Hasbro has had a light touch on WotC management (don't hurt the goose that lays the golden cards!), so I wouldn't say there is a significant difference between pre-purchase WotC and post-purchase, as far as brand management goes.

For that level of technical correctness, you'd have to cut TSR into various ownership time periods, as well.


When you read about how they did business, and no one reigned them in, it is a wonder they did not go under sooner.

Ive never read into it much. Did anyone at TSR ever have a business degree/actually ran a business before that or were they just a bunch of gamers/designers who were appointed titles and ran the company ad hoc?

Remove ads

Remove ads