William Ronald
Explorer
Sorry again.
Last edited:
William Ronald said:Should a new edition include epic level play in the core rules, and what would you want such rules to look like?
William Ronald said:Also, one thing that bugged me about the ELH were the artifacts. Now, a character can make a mace that works just like the Mace of St. Cuthbert. There was a sense of awe and danger about finding a 1st edition artifacts, but many of the 3.0 artifacts can be duplicated by many epic level characters. (For some of the more powerful items, maybe a few powers akin to those in 1st edition. Maybe epic level characters could create their own artifacts like this -- with the help of a higher or lower power (and after a few epic quests. Remember, few things that are worthwhile are easy.)
ES2 said:I said 3 years and they should do it.
What I would prefer they do, which they probably won't, is that instead of doing D&D4e, they just write a d20 book called d20 Fantasy.
Once they do this, we will have d20 Fantasy, d20 Modern, and d20 Future, and all the basis's will be covered with a single, generic d20 system that all use the same class system and are really interchangable with each other. IF they call it D&D: d20 Fantasy in one title, that's cool too.
DaveMage wrote:
WotC would certainly want to use the strength of the D&D name for a 4th edition. Simply releasing a system called "d20 Fantasy" could certainly be done, but it would never have the same impact (read: sales) as D&D 4th edition.