• NOW LIVE! Into the Woods--new character species, eerie monsters, and haunting villains to populate the woodlands of your D&D games.

Which Edition Do You Use?

Which Edition do You Use?

  • 3.0: It was good enough for me 2 years ago, it's good enough for me now.

    Votes: 85 22.0%
  • 3.5: WoTC deserves my $90. Again.

    Votes: 207 53.6%
  • I have combined the two versions into an unstoppable hybrid!

    Votes: 66 17.1%
  • 3rd Editions? I play OD&D/1e/2e/AD&D/AU/etc.

    Votes: 28 7.3%

Flexor the Mighty! said:
I voted AD&D 1e. The final, definitive version of EGG's vision for Dungeons & Dragons.

his eyesight was starting to fail him by then. :p

OD&D(1974) was what D&D was meant to be.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

3.0 D&D.

Bought and sold the 3.5 core rulebooks.
A handful of improvements, mixed in with an equal number of negative changes.
A ton of changes that seemed to be made just for the sake of changing something.

All considered it was really only on-par with 3.0 IMHO, just different.
Given that I already had plenty of 3.0 books, I saw no reason to start all over again with 3.5, and conversion seemed unnecessarily difficult in most cases.

I did keep, and still use the 3.5 Monsters Manual though... immense improvement in that book.
 

The most unstoppable hybrid of all-- D&D v3.1415926....!!!

That's right, I play "D&D, edition pi!" And it's non-terminating! Mwahahahahahahahah!!!
 

G'day

Actually, on those miserably few occasions when I get to actually play an RPG, I usually play ForeSight or its fantasy adjunct HindSight. I am getting so desperate that I am actually considering teaching my twelve-year-old nephew to play RPGs. And he think Rob Schneider's Animal is a good movie.

But when/if I do play D&D, 3.0 works well enough for me.

Regards,


Agback
 

I'm a junkie. I got all 3.5 stuff, and I'll continue to get it, despite not having any time to play for a while. But soon... soon, I tell you!

Besides, I blow more than that on DVDs in some months anyway. Now THERE I have a problem. I must be stopped.
 

Unstoppable Hybrid, which is mostly 3.5 minus the few changes I didn't like (i.e., Face instead of Space, Ambidexterity and TWF remain seperate Feats, etc.) plus 3.0 stuff from 3rd Party sources as well as my own creations updated as I saw fit to update them.
 

The only edition I've ever played was 3.5...

So the way I see it, I did not dish out $90 to WotC again.... I spent $90 on a game that JUST came out that I've never played before and enjoy it.

I'm kinda like an reverse-diaglo... I'll "grow up" on 3.5 and claim all the other editions are heretic stone age hippy versions... :)
 


You know that the hybrid answer is very misleading since every edition after OD&D was 'designed' to be house-ruled hence most proabably everyone uses some form of house-rules (i.e., unstoppable hybrid).
 

irdeggman said:
You know that the hybrid answer is very misleading since every edition after OD&D was 'designed' to be house-ruled hence most proabably everyone uses some form of house-rules (i.e., unstoppable hybrid).

I don't think so.

If you play 3.0 and 3.5, you might houserule either.

But if you play either version with a significant version of the other, then it qualifies as a "hybrid."
 

Into the Woods

Remove ads

Top