Which kind of thread do you prefer?

[haakon1]

A meta-poll: Which kind of thread for you prefer?

 

[pemerton]

Do you feel that the fires are running short of gasoline?!

Anyway, I voted "paladin" - I do enjoy a good alignment thread!

 

[dd.stevenson]

Not bad, but you're missing some options:

GNS threadjacked threads
Bizarre advocacy threads
Circular argument threads
Poorly fact-checked threads

Also... Meta threads in the wrong forum

 

[JamesonCourage]

You did the thread wrong.

 

[Umbran]

I prefer threads without sarcasm disguised as irony.

 

[tuxgeo]

I didn't vote. (I'm a Conscientious Abnegator.)

(I'm also a Commutiny Exporter -- perhaps the only one here.)

(I also wouldn't have voted if you had included an option for "Lemon Curry," so don't feel disappointed on that account.)

 

[haakon1]

Also... Meta threads in the wrong forum

Well played, sir, well played!

 

[sabrinathecat]

I voted for all of them.
Some of those thread types just make me snicker. I love when a question has been answered or presented a perfect explanation for a point of view, only to be totally ignored by people who don't bother to read what other people had to say. Kinda like most people just did with this post of mine.

 

[delericho]

I actually enjoy discussions of new editions (I clicked "Edition Wars", but I do prefer it when the conversation is actually civil), and also Paladin/alignment threads. I know such topics do tend to get heated, but I don't think that's inevitable. Plus, it's good to be reminded that my opinions are not universally held.

 

[dd.stevenson]

I prefer threads without sarcasm disguised as irony.

Ouch, baby, very ouch.