Whirtlestaff's Wizards' Acad. Revisited, OOC02

[Leif]

Not only could I not find that defined anywhere, the only placed it's been used, according to Google, is on RPG sites like EnWorld.

Google is just wrong about that, then: I've heard/seen it elsewhere lenty of times. But without the misspelling of "pn" (on?)

 

[Leif]

Not only could I not find that defined anywhere, the only placed it's been used, according to Google, is on RPG sites like EnWorld.

Google is just wrong about that, then: I've heard/seen it elsewhere plenty of times. But without the misspelling of "pn" (on?)

OK, then, that's it for me! I am outta here! "See" you guys on Tuesday night/Wednesday.

 

[Maidhc O Casain]

I thought about whether or not the spell would create an image of the mount as well, and could see an arguments either way.

On the 'No' side, the description does say it creates images of 'the caster.'

On the 'Yes' side, I thought of several:

1. Equipment, etc. is also reproduced, and is produced by the images as it is used by the caster.
2. The spell is powerful enough that environmental effects (such as area spells) that cause visible changes to the caster are reproduced in the images.
3. It just wouldn't be very tricksy at all if Manny's images were all floating a foot off the ground with legs in position for riding a mount, but no mount visible . . . Since the spell description also states that it makes all sorts of accomodations to keep viewers confused it seems (at least somewhat) logical that it could reporduce a mount for that same reason.

Anyway, I'm good either way you decide but I'll need to know for future reference. Manny's puny enough I'll probably be using this often, and I need to know if I should dismount before casting it.

 

[Leif]

I thought about whether or not the spell would create an image of the mount as well, and could see an arguments either way.
On the 'Yes' side, I thought of several:
1. Equipment, etc. is also reproduced, and is produced by the images as it is used by the caster.
2. The spell is powerful enough that environmental effects (such as area spells) that cause visible changes to the caster are reproduced in the images.
3. It just wouldn't be very tricksy at all if Manny's images were all floating a foot off the ground with legs in position for riding a mount, but no mount visible . . . Since the spell description also states that it makes all sorts of accomodations to keep viewers confused it seems (at least somewhat) logical that it could reporduce a mount for that same reason.

Good argument! Ok, we'll do it that way!

 

[renau1g]

Excellent, otherwise Xavier would also look silly.

 

[Leif]

There may be those who might say that Xavier looks pretty d****** silly, anyway! Not me, of course!

 

[Scott DeWar]

You would never say any thing like that!

 

[Leif]

Thanks, DeWar! Trying to dig yourself out of that crack you got your butt wedged into, aren't ya? ... keep on digging ....

 

[Scott DeWar]

butt...crack...har har! that is just cheeky!!

Actualy i was trying to dig myself deeper on purpose by being sarchastic!

 

[Leif]

Actualy i was trying to dig myself deeper on purpose by being sarchastic!

I should have known....

("cheeky" hehe)