Who will "fill in the grid"?

[Rechan]

So? Let a third party publish it. In fact, I HOPE a third party publishes it. Then WotC can be free to make more serious classes.

You do realize that's what this thread is all about, right? Encouraging 3rd party publishers to do exactly that?

 

[Darkwolf71]

You do realize that's what this thread is all about, right? Encouraging 3rd party publishers to do exactly that?

And I'm encouraging.

 

[Rechan]

And I'm encouraging.

Really? How is this encouraging:

Instead you'd rather have some contrived class to fill the spot? I mean, an Alchemist? Instant trapsetter? Gaaah. Please, no.

Maybe my definition is different than yours, but saying something is a contrived, bad idea isn't exactly encouraging its creation.

 

[Darkwolf71]

What? I think it's a bad idea. Not going to change my mind. However, if it must be done, let a third party do it. See how simple that is?

Anyway, if you're so concerned about me not being encouraging to third parties (since that is what the thread is about), explain why you're sole contributions to the entire thread are you telling me how wrong I am?

Troll much? Hmm?

 

[Rechan]

What? I think it's a bad idea. Not going to change my mind. However, if it must be done, let a third party do it. See how simple that is?

Yeah, I don't call that encouraging at all. That's discouraging, in fact.

Anyway, if you're so concerned about me not being encouraging to third parties (since that is what the thread is about), explain why you're sole contributions to the entire thread are you telling me how wrong I am?

Troll much? Hmm?

Except for this.

 

[Darkwolf71]

Yeah, I don't call that encouraging at all. That's discouraging, in fact.

No, it's my opinion. I'm entitled to that, right? I suppose that Green Ronin is going to read my posts and think 'Well. That's it, Darkwolf doesn't like our ideas. Guess we better close up shop'. Flattering as that thought is, I find it rather unlikely.

Well, some folks are determined to take offense. Not sure why since I wasn't directing that to you, but whatever.

Except for this.

Ah, I thought there was something, I missed it when I looked. Whatever, Oddly enough I agreed with you in part. Meh. Like I said, some people just want to be offended. Whatever.

 

[Darkwolf71]

In any case, this is silly. Let's agree to disagree and let the topic get back on course, eh?

 

[Rechan]

No, it's my opinion. I'm entitled to that, right?

Sure, you're entitled to it. But after you've expressed it, why keep doing it. It's as simple as "I don't want to see that class." And you're done. The end.

 

[Klaus]

I'm rather partial to the wuxia style martial artist (either divorced from mystical aspects of the monk or those being optional) who runs through swarms of mooks, sweep kicking multiple monsters off of their feet or doing limited damage to groups through whirlwind strikes and the like. I think that could be a fun "martial controller" with optional striker/defender elements.

You're on to something here.

 

[Darkwolf71]

Sure, you're entitled to it. But after you've expressed it, why keep doing it. It's as simple as "I don't want to see that class." And you're done. The end.

And now that you've expressed your opinion, your done. Right?

So. Moving. On.