D&D General Why do we color-code Dragons?

It's pretty convenient that their abilities, alignment, likelihood of speaking and using magic, and danger level is all conveniently color-coded like a threat condition chart.

What are the in-world and metagame reasons? How would the game change if the bag of Skittles that are dragons didn't have a clear correspondence to game mechanics?
 

log in or register to remove this ad


They go back to a series of articles Gary Gygax published in a Diplomacy fanzine called Thangorodrim in 1969 and 1970. Gygax seems to have been extrapolating from Smaug in The Hobbit who is red and breathes fire. From there the colour-coded dragons made their way into Chainmail and then D&D. Excerpt from Jon Peterson's Playing at the World Vol II:

The cover of the second Thangorodrim depicted a dragon with the caption “Gary Gygax, alias Smaug—yes, there are good worms, too!” Within, a Diplomacy press release related to Smaug entitled “Red Dragon Remains Raised” referred to the scholarship of one Professor S. K. Eltolereth, curator of the Rhovanion National Museum, who recently supervised the recovery of an enormous dragon corpse from Long Lake. While it offered no particular description of the quality of red dragons, the next issue of Thangorodrim contains a second part of a manuscript supposedly translated by Eltolereth detailing the qualities of the “Arctic Dragon,” or Draco Articus, a white beast whose primary weapon is a chilling breath. The editor of Thangorodrim then revealed in an aside that this professor is, in fact, a pen name for Gygax, who will contribute further dragon lore to subsequent issues. The November 1969 issue describes Draco Nigrus, the “Black or Spitting Dragon,” a smaller dragon who spews streams of a “potent caustic enzyme” when angry. This was followed by an installment on the Green Dragon (Draco Chlorinum), enemy of the Mountain Giants, which breathes clouds of chlorine gas, is highly intelligent and hoards jade; a subsequent issue (July 1970) tells of the Draco Electricus, the Blue Dragon, which attacks enemies with lightning and is hunted by trolls for its blue hide. The final installment details the “Mottled or Purple Worm,” which the entry concedes is “not a true dragon,” being wingless and without a breath weapon, yet it has a “venomous sting in the tip of its tail.”​
By the end of 1970, of course, the publication of Chainmail was imminent, and its “Fantasy Supplement” has a great deal to say on the subject of dragons. The system description deals with the Red Dragon (Draco Conflagratio or Draco Horribilis, it specifies), which breathes fire in a truncated cone in front of it that is almost certain to kill any opponent other than a Wizard or another dragon. The conclusion of the entry notes, however, that “other kinds of Dragons can be introduced into games, if a little imagination is used” and goes on to describe the white, black, blue, and green dragons, as well as the purple dragon (not here described as a “Worm”), and even notes that the basilisk and cockatrice should be considered as branches of the dragon family.​
 

I've also discovered some '70s era books on mythological creatures that seem to indicate Gary might have drawn the colored dragons from Indian (Vedic?) folklore. Green dragons living in trees and breathing toxic gas. Black dragons dwelling in swamps and having a line of yellow, acidic breath. Red dragons breathing fire and living in mountains. And blue dragons dwelling in deserts and gathering the lightning from storms to use themselves.
 

I've also discovered some '70s era books on mythological creatures that seem to indicate Gary might have drawn the colored dragons from Indian (Vedic?) folklore. Green dragons living in trees and breathing toxic gas. Black dragons dwelling in swamps and having a line of yellow, acidic breath. Red dragons breathing fire and living in mountains. And blue dragons dwelling in deserts and gathering the lightning from storms to use themselves.
That would be fascinating and I’d be happy with it. Glad to hear that some non-19th century Northern European pseudo-medieval heraldric folklore found its way into modern dragon mythology.

It’s been frustrating to see how “euro centric” the definition of “dragon” has become in fantasy circles. If it doesn’t have 2 arms, w legs, huge bat wings, long tail, sort of trex face and horns, it’s not a “real” dragon. Those other variants have other names. Asian dragons are not “default” LOL
 


In my current homebrew setting color coding is an attempt by sages to apply a framework through which to understand dragons that doesn’t actually adhere very well to reality (dragons are mostly thought to be dead or asleep), rather the colors may allude to their lineage but does not necessarily establish their powers.

Basically, I build each dragon to be unique.
 

The dragons in Anne McCaffrey's Dragonriders of Pern books had several colors. Green and Gold were female. Other colors were male. Also some size and status differences. Books came out starting late 60's. She also had pet sized fire lizards which we found out in later books were where the dragons came from.

Nothing says you have to adhere to the standard color coding. Genetic variance. Cross breeding. Crazy Wizards. Deity activity. Badly worded wish spells.
 

For our convenience, of course.
1757286991485.png
 

They really do seem to be colour-coded for our convenience. I've no idea why they ended up with the colours they have, but it is something I'm moving away from. Now I have dragons based on element and each element tends to have a range of colours that is typical.
 

Remove ads

Top