BrooklynKnight
First Post
Many people will agree that never before in recent memory has a book (or series of books) been able to capture the imaginations of so many children world wide and actually make them want to read. In a world of video games and internet, and instant gratifcation where images change constantly, its very difficult to entice todays child to actually READ. But somehow Harry Potter does it. Why?
Looking past all the political cartoons and jokes, all the magazine and newspaper articles following the latest novel, what makes this movement tic?
In part, it IS the writing. Rowling somehow manages to pull you into Harry's world in the very first book, instantly making you sympathize with him. A downtrotten boy, abused by his family living a misreable life. Then within the span of a few chapters she makes us want to BE him. Who wouldnt want to be wisked away from their lives to a world where the flick of a wand makes feathers float, and the lift of a hand and a shout brooms fly!
We continue to sympathize and relate with Harry because despite his magical world, school is still school. He faces all the commanlities we did, and do. Confusion, Curiosity, Wonder, a Quest for Popularity, the school bully, school crushes and romances, mean teachers and great teachers, best friends.
Everything. Its all there, so clear and sharp. For most people every page wants to make you be a part of the book.
I belive, that another large part of the following for Harry Potter is due to the INCREDIBLE job done on the first movies. Well, second and third movies aside, you only really needed a first.
Harry Potter and the Sorcerers Stone was perfectly cast. It was this movie that first got me curious about the books to begin with. At first I dismissed them as childrens stories. Why would someone in college want to read them?
One day while waiting for another movie to begin, I cought the last 10 minutes of HPATSS. The end was intresting enough to convince me to see the entire movie, which later on I did.
Moving back to my previous statement, that the movie was perfectly cast...is a great great boon to the book.
I cannot pick up the Harry Potter books and NOT see the faces of the actors portrayed for them. I just cant. The actors fit so perfectly into their roles in the movies, that It simply makes the books come MORE alive then they realy are. To this day I cant shake the image of the original Dumbledore from my mind. His replacement in the 3rd movie sucked and Dumbledore will forever in my mind be synonymous with his original on screen persona.
Can any of us imagine any of the characters portrayed by another actor?
I really do think that the Harry Potter movie franchise, has greatly helped the popularity of the books.
Do you agree? What do YOU think? Why is a book about an 11 year old wizard (well now he's 17) so damned intresting?
Chime in!
Looking past all the political cartoons and jokes, all the magazine and newspaper articles following the latest novel, what makes this movement tic?
In part, it IS the writing. Rowling somehow manages to pull you into Harry's world in the very first book, instantly making you sympathize with him. A downtrotten boy, abused by his family living a misreable life. Then within the span of a few chapters she makes us want to BE him. Who wouldnt want to be wisked away from their lives to a world where the flick of a wand makes feathers float, and the lift of a hand and a shout brooms fly!
We continue to sympathize and relate with Harry because despite his magical world, school is still school. He faces all the commanlities we did, and do. Confusion, Curiosity, Wonder, a Quest for Popularity, the school bully, school crushes and romances, mean teachers and great teachers, best friends.
Everything. Its all there, so clear and sharp. For most people every page wants to make you be a part of the book.
I belive, that another large part of the following for Harry Potter is due to the INCREDIBLE job done on the first movies. Well, second and third movies aside, you only really needed a first.
Harry Potter and the Sorcerers Stone was perfectly cast. It was this movie that first got me curious about the books to begin with. At first I dismissed them as childrens stories. Why would someone in college want to read them?
One day while waiting for another movie to begin, I cought the last 10 minutes of HPATSS. The end was intresting enough to convince me to see the entire movie, which later on I did.
Moving back to my previous statement, that the movie was perfectly cast...is a great great boon to the book.
I cannot pick up the Harry Potter books and NOT see the faces of the actors portrayed for them. I just cant. The actors fit so perfectly into their roles in the movies, that It simply makes the books come MORE alive then they realy are. To this day I cant shake the image of the original Dumbledore from my mind. His replacement in the 3rd movie sucked and Dumbledore will forever in my mind be synonymous with his original on screen persona.
Can any of us imagine any of the characters portrayed by another actor?
I really do think that the Harry Potter movie franchise, has greatly helped the popularity of the books.
Do you agree? What do YOU think? Why is a book about an 11 year old wizard (well now he's 17) so damned intresting?
Chime in!