• NOW LIVE! Into the Woods--new character species, eerie monsters, and haunting villains to populate the woodlands of your D&D games.

Why we need a Superman ( a review)

Keifer113

First Post
It was the late 70's when the Superman movies came out. We had come through the horrors of Vietnam to see victory stolen from our grasp by the Watergate scandal. We were sitting through high inflation and a presidency that seemed to be paralyzed into in action. For Americans, hope of a better world was slipping out of our grasp.

They say movies and art in general reflect the times. Maybe, the real world sometimes reflects the movies. Superman made us believe once again in truth, justice and the American Way. He made us believe that there are good men who are willing to put aside what they want, to do the impossible, to be there for people when they need someone to save them.

The 80's reflected the rebirth of hope in America. Inflation came down. Unemployment came down. There were no more gas lines. America finally stood upto Communism where before she had let Communism spread throughout the world and ravage numerous countries under the yoke of tyranny. Terrorism was checked, and the movement to lessen governmental control over people began. I think it was the Superman movies that helped give us that hope, that ability to overcome our challenges. "they're a great people Kal-El, they wish to be. They only lack the light to show the way. For this reason above all, they're capacity for good, I have sent them you, my only son."

In the 80's, Superman was the light.

Then came the 90's. At the end of the that decade, I sat in a literature class, where a professor of mine asserted that every generation had a movie that defined it. She said hers was Cleopatra, with Liz Taylor. I quipped that ours would be Batman, and she laughed and said maybe.

I think I was right. The 80's ended with the fall of Communism, but the 90's began with dark times, that reflected the darkness of the Batman. While Superman represented the best in man, and hope of a better world, Batman represents the darkness that is in the soul of man, and a world that is harsh and twisted. Superman fights for good out of responsibilty, Batman for revenge. The 90's represented a time of corporate greed and malfeasance. A rise in unchecked terrorism. A rise in the banning of books, of an increase in thought control, a change in the idea that Good and Evil are absolutes and that they can be redefined based on popularity of thoughts and cultures. Ethics seemed to go out the door, and the country headed back into a recession.

We still live in a dark dark world. Post 9/11 kept things from changing. But in recent years, we have shyed away from darkness and are returning to hope. Movies like the Fantastic Four, the Incredibles, Spiderman have made us think about what it is like to stand for Good, to do what is right and that you don't have to kill and destroy and beat people up to be a positive force.

And now Superman Returns.

What an awesome movie. Brian Singer brings us back the magic of the first two movies and ignores the awfulness of the latter two. Superman is Savior, Superman is Hero, Superman is once again back to fight for truth, justice and the American Way. And to fight for his woman.

See, Superman, right after he defeated Zod in the second movie, went on a 5 year trip to see if Krypton still existed. During his time away, Lois had a child and became engaged. When Superman comes back, of course he wants to see her. But she is with another man....

And then there is Lex Luthor....upto his old plots again. He has a small group of cronies, including Kitty Kowalski, an able replacement for Miss Tessmacher(sp) from the first films.

The film is wonderfully acted, has great special effects, and truly makes you believe that someone like Superman could...well...be Superman. Brandon Routh fills in admirable for the near irreplaceable Christopher Reeve. My only complaint is he needs to bulk up a bit. Kate Bosworth...she is adorable as Lois Lane. Maybe too cutesy and not at all the brusque Lois Lane of the early movies and the comics, she is still a go-getter and has a great knack for getting in trouble. Kevin Spacey is charming as Lex Luthor. I feel he needed an Otis though as a foil for his genius. The rest of the cast are well done, though Perry White seemed cold and distant.

The story I have already touched upon, but I will say this...to me it seemed like the middle part of the movie was very short. It didn't really get into the meat of the central conflict of the story...that Lois has moved on ( or has she?), and how she really feels about his return, how he will deal with things, and so on.

The movie has some incredible special effects. I never felt that Superman was hanging on wires. He saves planes from falling, buildings from crushing people, outraces flames and puts them out with his superbreath.....but not once does he use his "repair the great wall of china vision." I think this movie sets a new standard for super hero special effects. I know they are expensive, but to break through the wall and make people believe they are seeing superheroes, they need to spend the cash to make it look real, and do it enough so that you don't sit there being bored and wondering why the heroes don't do more heroeing.

If I have any criticism of the flick its that it relies too much on the old Superman movies for some of the cliches. Yet I loved them then, and love them now. I still get that thrill when I hear John Williams theme.

I truly hope this movie ushers in a new age for America, where we regain the can do spirit, the unity of our country, the belief that the American Way of freedom and living one's dreams is the right way. We need Superman, because we can be a great people. Let us hope he lights the way.

1:24 AM - 4 Comments - 2 Kudos - Add Comment - Edit - Remove
 

log in or register to remove this ad


Not a bad review of the movie. However the political comentary before the review was onesided cloaking a bias and does not belong on these boards. As much as I want to comment on the review I want to argue the first half more. Therefore I shall be quiet about the whole thing.
 


*nod*

Keifer113, we do have a set of posting guidelines around here, seen in The Rules. "Keep it civil, don't shock Grandma, and avoid policits and religion" would be a good quick summary.

The political comments in that review, while perhaps interesting, are not appropriate for discussion around here.
 

Umbran said:

*nod*

Keifer113, we do have a set of posting guidelines around here, seen in The Rules. "Keep it civil, don't shock Grandma, and avoid policits and religion" would be a good quick summary.

The political comments in that review, while perhaps interesting, are not appropriate for discussion around here.

I was not aware of a political bias when I wrote this as much as a cultural bias. Looking back, yes Superman 1 and 2 came out during the Reagan years. But the Batman period covers Bush41, Clinton, and Bush 43.
 

I wasn't aware of a political bias as well, Keifer, and don't think there is. I was surprised by the comment, but it's better to roll with the moderators on such instances. :)
 

Odhanan said:
I wasn't aware of a political bias as well, Keifer, and don't think there is. I was surprised by the comment, but it's better to roll with the moderators on such instances. :)
In order to discuss the claims of the first part, particularly the movies defining the generation and the movie being needed by the events of the time requires one to delve into politics.

Which precludes me from commenting on any of this review beyond that :(
 

Bront said:
In order to discuss the claims of the first part, particularly the movies defining the generation and the movie being needed by the events of the time requires one to delve into politics.

To claraify: that's basically it - the first part of the review strongly links the character of various movies to the political climate of the times in which they appeared. While in the broad sense this is a valid line of inquiry, for these boards it is a bit problematic.

For example, what if I thought your characterization of the 1980s was thoroughly inaccurate? If it were, your analysis of the movies would be off. But I can't discuss that around here, because I'd need to discuss the politics of the 1980s to do so.

Ergo - the review cannot be thoroughly discussed. On top of that, it claims certain things as facts that many readers here might find highly questionable, and possibly offenseive if they really disagree.
 

Keifer113 said:
I was not aware of a political bias when I wrote this as much as a cultural bias. Looking back, yes Superman 1 and 2 came out during the Reagan years. But the Batman period covers Bush41, Clinton, and Bush 43.
There was some very political statements in your review. That second sentence, about Watergate, angered me with the clear bias the moment I read it for example.

This board strives to be apolitical, leave real-world politics at the door, and that includes commentary. What you may take as a given or plainly obvious may be plainly untrue, or even offensive to others.
 

I'm going to have to agree that there is a political bias. I understand the sentiment, and appreciate the meat of the review itself, but I also would argue some of the generalizations made about the times if this were an appropriate place.

Have you posted this at CircvsMaximus?
 

Into the Woods

Remove ads

Top