D&D General Why would someone that's the heir of both A Very Minor Duke and A Minor Baroness become A Adventurer?

Are they playing in 15th century UK or in some medieval fantasy world? Your comment only addresses the former.

By that some logic there should not be dwarves, elves, dragons, … so chances are they are playing in a fantasy world and your statement becomes meaningless / inapplicable
Probably no dragons on those tables.
 

log in or register to remove this ad



S'mon

Legend
It makes not a lot of sense on the face of it that his mother has a Baron title but that his sisters cannot inherit it. The exception I can think of is English monarchy male primogeniture where a woman could become monarch but only if she has no brothers. That is a rare exception & I don't recall that ever applying at lower levels.
 



The thing is that you lose a lot of the conflict or motivations which drive scenarios set in that era, especially romantic ones.

Consider Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice. What drives Mrs. Bennett in her match-making zeal for her daughters? The fact that her daughters cannot inherit, and her husband's heir is a second cousin and the estate is entailed on him. She and her family stands to lose her home if Mr. Bennett dies and a daughter does not marry well.
The Bennet family, though from a wealthy family, has blown through the family’s wealth, due to the parents’ disastrous investments. What drives Mrs. Bennett’s matchmaking zeal? The fact that the family is facing ruin, and she and her family stand to lose their home if the creditors come to collect before a child marries well.

That took 15 seconds.
 


thirdkingdom

Hero
Publisher
The Bennet family, though from a wealthy family, has blown through the family’s wealth, due to the parents’ disastrous investments. What drives Mrs. Bennett’s matchmaking zeal? The fact that the family is facing ruin, and she and her family stand to lose their home if the creditors come to collect before a child marries well.

That took 15 seconds.

But, but, but . . . It's not realistic if there's no sexism.
 



Ancalagon

Dusty Dragon
Out of boredom I've amused used A Mates Family Generation Tables to create a background for A Dnd Character and I'm puzzled. Why would someone that's the heir of both A Very Minor Duke and A Minor Baroness become A Adventurer?



So great is The Very Minor Dukes concern for his heir/my character, that he has assigned A Guard Force that consists of 1 31 Strong Platoon, 1 7 Strong Squad and 1 5 Strong Squad to protect his heir/my character
You can't go adventure with a small army at your back.
 

mamba

Hero
Probably no dragons on those tables.
no, probably not, given that they were for character background. My overall point is unaffected by this however. If you do not mirror 15th century UK in anything else, why does it have to mirror its misogyny

Actually, that's not true. In other posts the OP has specially mentioned the existence of dragons (usually as part of a noble's bodyguard).
I stand corrected, so it is even more in my favor ;)

The focus on dragons is also telling, chances are there would have been dwarves and elves on them, which still is making my point
 


Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition Starter Box

An Advertisement

Advertisement4

Top