Nice list.mmu1 said:Try Williams, Brust, Martin, Erikson, Gaiman, Bujold, Wolfe, Powers...
I'd throw R. Scott Bakkar into the mix, too. His Prince of Nothing books are my favorite new fantasy...
Nice list.mmu1 said:Try Williams, Brust, Martin, Erikson, Gaiman, Bujold, Wolfe, Powers...
Randolpho said:But be forewarned, Vig -- the quality (such as it is) goes *up* from there.
Touché...Galeros said:YEAH!![]()
Mallus said:Touché...
Seriously though, I can understand enjoying Dragonlance... it all depends what you're reading for. I think their prose is a like a hot needle to the optic nerve, but some people, with higher pain thresholds, I imagine, can see past their actual words straight away into the story, which admittedly, isn't half bad.
Because, while it has some fun ideas, some neat scenes and some likable characters, they're all delivered with all the writing panache of a below-grade-level 7th grader.Galeros said:I do not find the writing in any DL book really bad. I can not understand why so many people claim it is bad.
Mallus said:Nice list.
I'd throw R. Scott Bakkar into the mix, too. His Prince of Nothing books are my favorite new fantasy...
Mallus said:Nice list.
I'd throw R. Scott Bakkar into the mix, too. His Prince of Nothing books are my favorite new fantasy...
Whizbang Dustyboots said:Because, while it has some fun ideas, some neat scenes and some likable characters, they're all delivered with all the writing panache of a below-grade-level 7th grader.
It doesn't make someone a bad person if they like the novels, but enjoying a Twinkie doesn't make it great cuisine.
Whizbang Dustyboots said:Because, while it has some fun ideas, some neat scenes and some likable characters, they're all delivered with all the writing panache of a below-grade-level 7th grader.
It doesn't make someone a bad person if they like the novels, but enjoying a Twinkie doesn't make it great cuisine.