Klaus said:Y'know, I kind of liked the comic book adaptations of the first two Chronicles better than the novels.
The comic book adaptation for Dragons of Spring Dawning is still forthcoming.
jonesy said:Blanket statements like "they all go downhill after" or "everything not by W&H sucks" are really really horrible. :\
I own about a 130 of them, and there's some very good stuff there, better than what W&H have written.
Try the ones by Knaak (Huma, Kaz and generally anything about minotaurs), Pierson (the Taladas and Kingpriest trilogies) and Kirchoff (Defenders of Magic). They even write in such a way that you don't really need to know anything about the place beforehand.
I more or less loved them, especially Achamian. I think what you're calling navel gazing I'd call 'fleshing out wonderfully human characters who also happen to be epic level monks and sorcerers'.phoenixgod2000 said:I found his characters to be navel gazers of the worst sort.
That's a gross misrepresentation of the novels. More so than any recent fantasy they have a beginning, middle, and end. It is the story of the Crusade, from the political machinations at it's inception to the eventual siege of the Holy City, plus the gradual revelation of connections to several more ancient conflicts. A lot happens.All they do is have the same arguements over and over again and move the plot forward once every hundred pages.
Raistlin is a good character. Good enough that he survived Weiss and Hickman's attempts at portraying him.As for Dragonlance, I believe that Raistlin Majere (one of the main characters) is one of my top five favorite fantasy characters ever...
Galeros said:I do not find the writing in any DL book really bad. I can not understand why so many people claim it is bad.
I think you are correct, there.Galeros said:I do not think I will ever convince you heathens that Dragonlance is like holy ambrosia.![]()