I think that in a system that has both skills/combat mechanics and attributes, there needs to be a clear distinction between learned experience/ability and innate talent.
Many posters here keep comparing wisdom to higher understanding/enlightenment... but I think that confuses things. IMO, enlightenment/understanding are personality traits a character possesses- but really say nothing about an individual character's capabilities. Same for
an unreasonable elf-hater. He may be extremely cunning, insightful, aware, and he could have a photographic memory. Being enlightened is just like any other personality trait or set of beliefs a character can hold. Being a genius does not mean a person can't make stupid choices, being wise doesn't mean a character cannot be foolhardy.
Many posters here keep comparing wisdom to higher understanding/enlightenment... but I think that confuses things. IMO, enlightenment/understanding are personality traits a character possesses- but really say nothing about an individual character's capabilities. Same for
an unreasonable elf-hater. He may be extremely cunning, insightful, aware, and he could have a photographic memory. Being enlightened is just like any other personality trait or set of beliefs a character can hold. Being a genius does not mean a person can't make stupid choices, being wise doesn't mean a character cannot be foolhardy.