Vigilance
Explorer
Baron Opal said:That seems to be part of the draw.
If by "part of the draw" you mean the arcane, intimidating and off-putting part, I agree completely.
Baron Opal said:That seems to be part of the draw.
Vigilance said:I was interesting in learning some design-fu and getting some cool books, not joining a club.
I thought these were just ransom projects.
Just seems like a very complicated, arcane process.
Vigilance said:If by "part of the draw" you mean the arcane, intimidating and off-putting part, I agree completely.
It is a shame you feel this way. As a patron of the 2nd and now 3rd project, I find the process and result to be quite the opposite. Maybe when you hear feedback about this third project, you will be interested in the next one (assuming there is a 4th).Vigilance said:If by "part of the draw" you mean the arcane, intimidating and off-putting part, I agree completely.
Monkey King said:The first one was extremely arcane, though not really complicated. It just follows the old Renaissance model: patrons pay writer/artist/someone to make a thing. The thing gets made. End of story.
The second one is a little more traditional, as people who are patrons of any project can get a copy of that one.
I expect the third may be even simpler. The reason it's limited to a "club", as you say, is that I can only handle the input from so many patrons at a time. Beyond that, it's hard to teach design-fu or respond to questions in a timely way.
Monkey King said:Huh, I'll buy arcane and off-putting, I guess, sort of. But why intimidating?
Vigilance said:But it was the patrons who closed the first book off yes? Meaning it could happen again?
Vigilance said:In other words, I could sign up for the current book, thinking "I can buy book #2 later", but then those patrons can vote, and close it off before that happens?
Yes indeed. But the folks who pushed for it were a tiny minority; most people wanted the work seen more widely. I think eventually (project #4? who knows) I'll propose a project that is meant from the start to be released to the public.I was just looking at the livejournal a little, and it seemed the patrons (some of them) were the driving force behind the exclusivity.
Monkey King said:No, it cannot happen again, mostly because I feel burned by the way the first one turned out. I wasn't as clear as I could have been about the terms of the first one, and when I asked, "So, future patrons can get copies, right?" some people disagreed.