WotC Announces OGL 1.1 -- Revised Terms, Royalties, and Annual Revenue Reporting

There has been a lot of speculation recently about WotC's plans regarding the Open Gaming License and the upcoming One D&D. Today, WotC shared some information. In short, they will be producing a new Open Gaming License (note that the previous OGL 1.0a will still exist, and can still be used). However, for those who use the new OGL 1.1, which will be released in early 2023, there will be some...

There has been a lot of speculation recently about WotC's plans regarding the Open Gaming License and the upcoming One D&D. Today, WotC shared some information.

In short, they will be producing a new Open Gaming License (note that the previous OGL 1.0a will still exist, and can still be used). However, for those who use the new OGL 1.1, which will be released in early 2023, there will be some limitations added with regards the type of product which can use it, and -- possibly controversially -- reporting to WotC your annual OGL-related revenue.

They are also adding a royalty for those third party publishers who make more than $750K per year.

Interestingly, only books and 'static electronic files' like ebooks and PDFs will be compatible with the new OGL, meaning that apps, web pages, and the like will need to stick to the old OGL 1.0a.

There will, of course, be a lot of debate and speculation over what this actually means for third party creators, and how it will affect them. Some publishers like Paizo (for Pathfinder) and others will likely simply continue to use the old OGL. The OGL 1.0a allows WotC to update the license, but allows licensees to continue to use previous versions "to copy, modify and distribute any Open Game Content originally distributed under any version of this License".


wotc-new-logo-3531303324.jpg



1. Will One D&D include an SRD/be covered by an OGL?

Yes. First, we’re designing One D&D with fifth edition backwards compatibility, so all existing creator content that is compatible with fifth edition will also be compatible with One D&D. Second, we will update the SRD for One D&D as we complete its development—development that is informed by the results of playtests that we’re conducting with hundreds of thousands of D&D players now.

2. Will the OGL terms change?

Yes. We will release version 1.1 of the OGL in early 2023.

The OGL needs an update to ensure that it keeps doing what it was intended to do—allow the D&D community’s independent creators to build and play and grow the game we all love—without allowing things like third-parties to mint D&D NFTs and large businesses to exploit our intellectual property.

So, what’s changing?

First, we’re making sure that OGL 1.1 is clear about what it covers and what it doesn’t. OGL 1.1 makes clear it only covers material created for use in or as TTRPGs, and those materials are only ever permitted as printed media or static electronic files (like epubs and PDFs). Other types of content, like videos and video games, are only possible through the Wizards of the Coast Fan Content Policy or a custom agreement with us. To clarify: Outside of printed media and static electronic files, the OGL doesn’t cover it.

Will this affect the D&D content and services players use today? It shouldn’t. The top VTT platforms already have custom agreements with Wizards to do what they do. D&D merchandise, like minis and novels, were never intended to be part of the OGL and OGL 1.1 won’t change that. Creators wishing to leverage D&D for those forms of expression will need, as they always have needed, custom agreements between us.

Second, we’re updating the OGL to offer different terms to creators who choose to make free, share-alike content and creators who want to sell their products.

What does this mean for you as a creator? If you’re making share-alike content, very little is going to change from what you’re already used to.

If you’re making commercial content, relatively little is going to change for most creators. For most of you who are selling custom content, here are the new things you’ll need to do:
  1. Accept the license terms and let us know what you’re offering for sale
  2. Report OGL-related revenue annually (if you make more than $50,000 in a year)
  3. Include a Creator Product badge on your work
When we roll out OGL 1.1, we will also provide explanatory videos, FAQs, and a web portal for registration to make navigating these requirements as easy and intuitive as possible. We’ll also have help available to creators to navigate the new process.

For the fewer than 20 creators worldwide who make more than $750,000 in income in a year, we will add a royalty starting in 2024. So, even for the creators making significant money selling D&D supplements and games, no royalties will be due for 2023 and all revenue below $750,000 in future years will be royalty-free.

Bottom line: The OGL is not going away. You will still be able to create new D&D content, publish it anywhere, and game with your friends and followers in all the ways that make this game and community so great. The thousands of creators publishing across Kickstarter, DMsGuild, and more are a critical part of the D&D experience, and we will continue to support and encourage them to do that through One D&D and beyond.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Azzy

ᚳᚣᚾᛖᚹᚢᛚᚠ
Paizo May could capture their business.
I know this has been mentioned a couple times, but I strongly disagree. Paizo is too busy with their own ruleset that caters to a slightly different playstyle. It wouldn't behoove them to abandon PF2 (or even split their attention between two systems) when their existing fanbase wouldn't really be interested in it (and existing 5e players wouldn't be interested in PF2).

No, if another company that's more invested in 5e did it, it would make more sense. Wait... EN Publishing already did that.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Azzy

ᚳᚣᚾᛖᚹᚢᛚᚠ
If I’m being honest, at this point I think the best thing for the industry would be for WotC to go bye bye. The fans will fragment. Some will leave the hobby. Those who stay will keep playing what they like and start homebrewing more to fill the gaps, find clones to play, or switch to other games entirely. WotC is sucking all the air out of the industry. The rest of the companies and games deserve to breathe, too.
This is some of the most hyperbolic rhetoric that I've read on these forums. It's silly at best.
 

Micah Sweet

Level Up & OSR Enthusiast
I think you are mistaken with this take.

How many people do you really think are playing D&D because they love playing roleplaying games... and how many are playing D&D because they love "D&D"? Or they love Critical Role, who plays D&D? Or they played video games based on or adapted from D&D?

The current overwhelming success of D&D right now IS NOT based on the roleplaying game-fan pool swelling up... it's on the D&D 5E-fan pool swelling up. And if you were to remove WotC (and thus contemporary D&D from the equation)... a large number of the current fans would go away too. They won't "switch" to another system, or even an older style of D&D... they'll just stop playing altogether. They are WAY WAY too many other options for people's time for them to keep playing other versions of other games that they don't really care about because they aren't a part of the D&D 5E community.

Yes, we folks on EN World would find other games to play (and most of us probably already play other games already too). But we are a select few. We are nowhere near the majority. So to think that our attitudes towards the situation would match most other people is not a justifiable belief in my opinion. After all... if all these new D&D fans wanted to just play RPGs in general (and not 5E specifically)... where have they been all these years? They've have 40 years to get into roleplay gaming (any roleplay gaming) and never did. Seems to me most of those that have now found their way here through 5E don't actually care about the hobby on the whole, they only care about 5E in particular. You remove WotC and thus 5E from the equation... the hobby is not getting better as a result.
To be fair, if you remove WotC now, all the 5e stuff will still be there. No one's proposing going back in time and convincing Richard Atkinson not to buy TSR.
 


Hussar

Legend
I generally kept it to things they already said, you went even further
No, you absolutely have not. You have taken it much further. You've banged the drum that they will require more than simply a statement of sales, for example. Yet, all we know is that they will require such statement. Others have repeatedly talked about how the new SRD won't be OGC. Hell, a couple of posts above, we see pretty much word for word someone rubbing their hands in glee over the idea of WotC failing and D&D fading back into obscurity. Wait and see seems to be in very short supply.

I mean, you end your post with this:

That is kinda like ignoring the robber saying ‘give me your money or I shoot you’ because he hasn’t shot you yet… intentions matter

You're now equating WotC with a criminal and possible murderer. Iceberg hitting the Titanic. Tad hyperbolic no? Considering we don't know anything yet. But, sure, you're not going any further than just reading what they actually said.
 
Last edited:



Hussar

Legend
Yes, many companies spend more then most small RPG companies make just to keep such info secret, and/or to find that info about competitors.

I work with a company that is a VERY different field but that spends more on trying to get access to proprietary sales data of other companies then it does on it's Customer Service team.

In the past I worked with 3 different companies that were all really 1 company hiding in a trench coat, and when someone got fired they took proprietary sales info to another company and caused such a panic that the entire company was forced to sign NDAs and we got new updated computers and were not allowed to print anything... The cost of said new systems most likely is more then D&D made last year (can't be 100% sure but it was either at or just below needing a B in there)
Again, you're talking about them requiring proof of sales, receipts, complete breakdowns of sales and whatnot. Which, sure, is confidential information. But, that's a heck of a lot more than sales. Companies routinely report their sales for the year. Hell, we KNOW, almost to the dollar, what WotC's D&D sales were last year. We know because it's been reported.

So, no, they're not going to be asking for entire breakdowns and whatnot. Again, this is going to be far more a formality than anything else. It's going to be voluntary reporting of gross sales. Whoopdeedoo. If they wanted receipts and everything else, there wouldn't be a more than SIX HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLAR gap between those who have to report (50K+) and those who have to start paying royalties.
 


mamba

Legend
No, you absolutely have not. You have taken it much further. You've banged the drum that they will require more than simply a statement of sales, for example. Yet, all we know is that they will require such statement. Others have repeatedly talked about how the new SRD won't be OGC. Wait and see seems to be in very short supply.
The first one is an obvious conclusion, and if I recall correctly I only brought that up once you claimed it would be no more than two checkmarks. As I said, you started going beyond the statement. For the second one notice the emphasis on others
You're now equating WotC with a criminal and possible murderer. Iceberg hitting the Titanic. Tad hyperbolic no? Considering we don't know anything yet. But, sure, you're not going any further than just reading what they actually said.
I assumed you know how analogies work, if your takeaway is that the analogy is that WotC might be a murderer, then you got it all wrong... I even clarified that it was about the fact that intentions matter and cannot / should not be ignored. Your claim is flat out ridiculous.
 
Last edited:

Remove ads

Remove ads

Top