WotC has a milking machine now (Draconomicon I)

[Campbell]

Draconomicon was an excellent book in 3.X D&D. The only issue I had with it was the infestation of dragon stat blocks that took up perhaps 70 pages or so. If space in 4E Draconomicons is filled up with filler material like that to an even greater degree that would be a bummer, but if it is filled with actually interesting material on Dragons (like the rest of 3.X Draconomicon was), than these books would be great.

I don't know about you, but I sure didn't need 56 pages on dragon physiology, psychology, and culture that was sparse on adventure fodder. Lords of Madness, on the other hand, was filled to the brim with the sort of rich plot hooks I want to see in future monster spotlight books.

 

[Wolfspider]

It's great that you've decided to share this with the rest of the class, but I'm just not sure that this information was relevant or interesting to anyone but yourself.

It's great that you've decided to share this with the rest of the class, but I'm just not sure that this information was relevant or interesting to anyone but yourself.

 

[Zamkaizer]

It's great that you've decided to share this with the rest of the class, but I'm just not sure that this information was relevant or interesting to anyone but yourself.

It's great that you've decided to share this with the rest of the class, but I'm just not sure that this information was relevant or interesting to anyone but yourself...

...you seem much more in your element discussing draconian mammaries.

 

[Hussar]

/me scratches head.

So, let me get this straight. Optional books, that you are under no obligation to buy, are only good when we have fewer choices?

Guess that whole OGL thing REALLY pissed you off huh?

 

[M.L. Martin]

TSR didn't do market research, so whoever told you that was feeding you an urban legend.

Actually, TSR did do some market research--or am I the only one who remembers those feedback cards that used to be included in modules?

They didn't necessarily do it effectively, and they may have stopped doing it during the last couple of years of the company's life, but they did do some of it.

 

[Lonely Tylenol]

Hmm. This is become quite the meme.

That is what I'm saying, yes.

 

[The Little Raven]

Oh yeah, thought I should share the fact that the title immediately brought to mind a particular Mr Show skit...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4dBYNnaYz_I

 

[Mistwell]

It's great that you've decided to share this with the rest of the class, but I'm just not sure that this information was relevant or interesting to anyone but yourself.

Ah, but it was. I found it very interesting, and relevant to the 4e boards in general. Peer pressure on people who behave poorly is a useful communal tool.

 

[coyote6]

Now I'm confused. Are we cows or sheep? Or both? I know we're cowards and stupid and bad DMs, from previous threads.

New template -- half-sheep cows. Or maybe it's half-cow sheep? I forget.

Mooooobaaaaaaaaa.

 

[Incenjucar]

New template -- half-sheep cows. Or maybe it's half-cow sheep? I forget.

Mooooobaaaaaaaaa.

Mancowsheep?

Natural prey of manbearpig?