trappedslider
Legend
Hmm, I got product i shouldn't have and i know this product isn't in the open yet.. should i contact the company in question or make a youtube video about it?
Choices choices
Choices choices
News outlets post leaks all the time and they don't get the pinkertons at their door making threats. Likely because a journalist is more likely to know their rights and would close the door in their face and tell the pinkertons that they're gonna call the real cops to trespass them.Hmm, I got product i shouldn't have and i know this product isn't in the open yet.. should i contact the company in question or make a youtube video about it?
Choices choices
The Pinkerton agents] cited several statutes about copyright infringement and some other things threatening 1-10 years in jail and up to $200,000 in fines if I failed to cooperate,” Dan Cannon told Kotaku over an email. “They also said if I didn’t hand over the product, they would call the county sheriff and detain us until they arrived to arrest us and search my house for the product and that they would most likely force us to show receipts for every magic card in the house (which is literally over a million cards).” Kotaku reached out to Wizards of the Coast, but did not receive a comment by the time of publication.
Hmm, I got product i shouldn't have and i know this product isn't in the open yet.. should i contact the company in question or make a youtube video about it?
Choices choices
I think a lot of folks have a different understanding of property rights than I do.
If you discover your missing bike locked up at someone’s house, would you hesitate to ask the police to retrieve it? You have proof of ownership and all that.
That's fun and all, but let's be real - at most he did something that's not criminal (or not in an obvious way), and not immoral, and only "unethical" if you're a hardline capitalist of kind most Americans are not.I know!
Look, I got all this great info ... I'm sure if I brag about it to all the gamers I know on discord, everything is cool, right?
Because .... something something no big whoop, people in my high school do it all the time.
I dunno. It's weird. I mean, if the guy had received someone else's diary in the mail, and was reading a page of it every day on youtube, people would be cool with that? No?
I tell ya, situation ethics are a heckuva thing, aren't they?
Yup. This is down to some idiot middle or upper management wankers at WotC thinking it was a "jolly wheeze" to hire the Pinkertons (I'm sure whoever did that got off on the fact that they were hiring notorious thugs) to go intimidate a Youtuber, and not even for one second considering that "Oh, actually that might backfire". They must have an astonishing echo-chamber corporate culture that no-one said "Maybe this isn't smart".News outlets post leaks all the time and they don't get the pinkertons at their door making threats. Likely because a journalist is more likely to know their rights and would close the door in their face and tell the pinkertons that they're gonna call the real cops to trespass them.
Here Hasbro just thought they could get away with it.
That's fun and all, but let's be real - at most he did something that's not criminal, and not immoral, and only "unethical" if you're a hardline capitalist of kind most Americans are not.
Putting aside the legal arguments about all this. Like, how, given their negative publicity in the last year as it relates to MtG and D&D did they think this was a good idea? That's the most astounding part. They thought this would be received...well?Yup. This is down to some idiot middle or upper management wankers at WotC thinking it was a "jolly wheeze" to hire the Pinkertons (I'm sure whoever did that got off on the fact that they were hiring notorious thugs) to go intimidate a Youtuber, and not even for one second considering that "Oh, actually that might backfire". They must have an astonishing echo-chamber corporate culture that no-one said "Maybe this isn't smart".
If they were stolen, the police would have been at his door, and this would be a non-story. If the distributor was suspected, WotC would be menacing them primarily.Well .... facts matter. We don't actually know all the facts yet, do we? We don't even know where he got the cards, since he's changed his story. Was it his distributor? A local store? By accident? On purpose?
Even then you, as a lawyer, know it's only "likely", and the armed thugs threatened him with criminal punishments, rather than saying "Yo don't make us take you to court it'll cost you". What do you think, EXACTLY that they could have sued on?I will say that even in the best light possible, he likely did something civilly actionable.
What?As for immoral and unethical, I am too tired of people today that are like, "Pirating it no big whoop" to desire to engage in this debate. You have your morals and ethics, I have mine.