D&D 5E (2024) WotC Should Make 5.5E Specific Setting

Having a "homeland" is not the only way to "accommodate and integrate" them into the setting. Shifters, for example, are deeply integrated into Eberron, as are changelings. Both the kalashtar and the warforged have homelands.
I wouldn't call warforged as having a homeland in the Mournlands, they are very much creations of the Five Nations. But even so, I always considered Shifters and Changelings as having less direct connection to Eberron lore than warforged and Kalshatar. (You can remove the former without significant impact to the setting, the latter not so much). I would consider both Changelings and shifters about as integrated into Eberron society as Dragonborn or tieflings are.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Edit: they're doing that because the PHB species are meant to be the 'common' ones, grungs and leonin communities can take a backseat until the baseline options actually have establishment in the setting first
Not all of the PHB races are common. Tieflings, Aasimar, Dragonborn, etc. are still pretty rare.
what if i want to be from the sword coast? it's difficult because there's no character anchors for someone of their species.
Then be from the Sword Coast. Communities don't spell out every single member that lives in them, and we know from the established Forgotten Realms lore that Dragonborn have spread out in fairly small numbers across the realms. Not enough to warrant an entire settlement of Dragonborn, but enough that there can be and probably are a few in many/most of them.
setting integrated ones, established historical ones, local political ones. the kinds you don't get when you poof a random community into the setting to excuse a character being there.

Us, the people playing them, is it so weird that when someone plays a character in forgotten realms sword coast we want them to y'know, be from and have notable connections to forgotten realms sword coast?
You don't need an established Dragonborn settlement on the Sword Coast in order to have an integrated Dragoborn with ties to the area. There's established lore that provides for reasons that you are in or live in X on the Sword Coast. From there you can just write up the connections you want/need in your background.
 

Your DM won't let you add a small family of dragonborn to a town?! What you need is a better DM, not a setting book that spells out population demographics in minute detail.

I'm pretty sure the source material does not state that there are zero dragonborn. There will be a whole bunch of inhabitants whose species is not stated.
Yep, and this is already established lore from the Sword Coast Adventure Guide.

"Some of Tymanther's dragonborn have spread across Faerun and gained reputations as competent, highly sought-after mercenaries."

So there is reason for them to be in or from any settlement you want your PC to be from.
 

I would consider both Changelings and shifters about as integrated into Eberron society
They are integrated into the setting and are a fundamental part of it. That is why they are in the Eberron core book.
as Dragonborn or tieflings are.
Right. Dragonborn and Tieflings were not PHB races when Eberron was created. That is literally the whole point of the discussion.
 

Yep, and this is already established lore from the Sword Coast Adventure Guide.

"Some of Tymanther's dragonborn have spread across Faerun and gained reputations as competent, highly sought-after mercenaries."

So there is reason for them to be in or from any settlement you want your PC to be from.
I will just mention that you can get from Aber to Toril by spelljammer, and so a few Dragonborn will have made the journey before the mass migration. In which case, they are likely to have ended up near where there are spaceports, such as the Sword Coast.
 

They are integrated into the setting and are a fundamental part of it. That is why they are in the Eberron core book.

Right. Dragonborn and Tieflings were not PHB races when Eberron was created. That is literally the whole point of the discussion.
Why does that matter? Are there demons or devils in Eberron? If yes, then there will be Tieflings somewhere in the setting. Are there dragons in Eberron? If yes, then the same process to make them from dragon eggs elsewhere should work, so there are probably Dragonborn there as well. Perhaps not in large enough numbers to warrant a write-up in the book, but enough that they could be a PC race.
 

They are integrated into the setting and are a fundamental part of it. That is why they are in the Eberron core book.

Right. Dragonborn and Tieflings were not PHB races when Eberron was created. That is literally the whole point of the discussion.
You need to read what Keith Baker has to say about this. He says there is a space for everything in Eberron, and it should be refluffed as needed. So, for example, if a player wants to play a tortle, they might have started out as a natural turtle who was mutated by the magical radiation of the Mournland.

Baker is a great believer in “there is no canon” and that the published material is just a collection of suggestions for a table’s own version.
 

You need to read what Keith Baker has to say about this. He says there is a space for everything in Eberron, and it should be refluffed as needed. So, for example, if a player wants to play a tortle, they might have started out as a natural turtle who was mutated by the magical radiation of the Mournland.

Baker is a great believer in “there is no canon” and that the published material is just a collection of suggestions for a table’s own version.
Or they were in Embarrassing all alomg just like the Drafonborn, but earlier descriptions just folded them all under the label "Lizaedfolk". Easy peasey.
 

You need to read what Keith Baker has to say about this. He says there is a space for everything in Eberron, and it should be refluffed as needed. So, for example, if a player wants to play a tortle, they might have started out as a natural turtle who was mutated by the magical radiation of the Mournland.

Baker is a great believer in “there is no canon” and that the published material is just a collection of suggestions for a table’s own version.
In the 3e Eberron book it has a section for Other Races. Now it talks about monsters as PCs there, but if you can be a monstrous race not mentioned in the books, you can be a Tiefling or Dragonborn. Especially since the 3e monster books contained numerous Planetouched races. You can be a Wispling or Maeluth, but not a Tiefling or Aasimar?
 

In the 3e Eberron book it has a section for Other Races. Now it talks about monsters as PCs there, but if you can be a monstrous race not mentioned in the books, you can be a Tiefling or Dragonborn. Especially since the 3e monster books contained numerous Planetouched races. You can be a Wispling or Maeluth, but not a Tiefling or Aasimar?
In Baker's Exploring Eberron (good book, recommended by me) he has this to say about aasimar:
These rare humanoids aren’t a race of their own. Rather, aasimar are individuals shaped by exposure to divine forces or the energies of the planes, as discussed in chapter 3. The following subraces reflect some of the unusual aasimar one might encounter in Eberron.
He then goes on to add four additional subtypes of aasimar as well.
 

Remove ads

Top