WotC Would you buy WotC products produced or enhanced with AI?

Would you buy a WotC products with content made by AI?

  • Yes

    Votes: 45 13.8%
  • Yes, but only using ethically gathered data (like their own archives of art and writing)

    Votes: 12 3.7%
  • Yes, but only with AI generated art

    Votes: 1 0.3%
  • Yes, but only with AI generated writing

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Yes, but only if- (please share your personal clause)

    Votes: 14 4.3%
  • Yes, but only if it were significantly cheaper

    Votes: 6 1.8%
  • No, never

    Votes: 150 46.2%
  • Probably not

    Votes: 54 16.6%
  • I do not buy WotC products regardless

    Votes: 43 13.2%

Status
Not open for further replies.
Analogies are terrible, but - an LLM can be likened to a box of puzzle pieces. It does not contain the picture on the box! But you can get the picture out of it if you put the pieces together in order.
 

log in or register to remove this ad


Analogies are terrible, but - an LLM can be likened to a box of puzzle pieces. It does not contain the picture on the box! But you can get the picture out of it if you put the pieces together in order.
This is also inaccurate. It does not store the original data, and you cannot access the original data with the right creative prompts.
So something its aware of, in the public domain, it cannot get right?
Correct.
 



And you believe this is because it just is associating words, and not because its been intentionally programmed to not regurgitate the exact text?
Yes. You can see this in the output. In that chat, it says:

Sure! The House on the Borderland by William Hope Hodgson was published in 1908 and is in the public domain. Here are the first two paragraphs.

If you ask about, say, the PHB you get a message like

I can’t provide the full Cleric class description from the Dungeons & Dragons 5th Edition Player’s Handbook, as it’s a copyrighted work. However, I can summarize it for you or point you to the key features. Here’s a concise summary.
 

This is false. If it were true LLMs would be incapable of generating quotes or replicating famous images.
This is incorrect. They can return exact sequences of tokens which are highly represented in the training data. You can get "tomorrow, and tomorrow, and tomorrow" out, because it is one of the most famous passages in English literature. You can't get the House on the Borderland, because it is more obscure.
 

I can’t provide the full Cleric class description from the Dungeons & Dragons 5th Edition Player’s Handbook, as it’s a copyrighted work. However, I can summarize it for you or point you to the key features. Here’s a concise summary.

Yes see, thats it right there. Its been told it cannot. Just like how its been told it cannot post art that some would be offended by.

It still creates it, it just wont show it.
 

Yes see, thats it right there. Its been told it cannot. Just like how its been told it cannot post art that some would be offended by.

It still creates it, it just wont show it.
No. The output says that it can create it, just like the output says that it can create The House on the Borderland. But it cannot necessarily do this because that data is not stored in the LLM.

We can't actually tell whether or not it could reconstruct the whole PHB without that guardrail. (I am highly skeptical). But we know for sure that it cannot create many works that it was trained on, because it does not store that data.
 

No. The output says that it can create it, just like the output says that it can create The House on the Borderland. But it cannot necessarily do this because that data is not stored in the LLM.

We can't actually tell whether or not it could reconstruct the whole PHB without that guardrail. (I am highly skeptical). But we know for sure that it cannot create many works that it was trained on, because it does not store that data.

I think that makes for some pretty interesting questions, primary being.

Then what's the point.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Remove ads

Top