shilsen Adventurer May 4, 2007 #11 Caliban said: I'd also reduce the crit range to 20/x2 (if it was better), because you aren't hitting with the part of the weapon that has the increased crit range. Click to expand... Same here.
Caliban said: I'd also reduce the crit range to 20/x2 (if it was better), because you aren't hitting with the part of the weapon that has the increased crit range. Click to expand... Same here.
moritheil First Post May 5, 2007 #12 Piratecat said: I'd allow it at -2 or -4 to hit. I'd have to consider which. Click to expand... I totally read that as "I'd hit it" on my first pass.
Piratecat said: I'd allow it at -2 or -4 to hit. I'd have to consider which. Click to expand... I totally read that as "I'd hit it" on my first pass.
Jdvn1 Hanging in there. Better than the alternative. May 5, 2007 #13 Plane Sailing said: I'd allow a pommel at -2 as a partly improvised weapon - however, the pommel wouldn't be considered magical so it wouldn't do any good against liches - it certainly wouldn't allow any of the weapons special properties IMO. Click to expand... I consider it a shot "with the flat of the blade."
Plane Sailing said: I'd allow a pommel at -2 as a partly improvised weapon - however, the pommel wouldn't be considered magical so it wouldn't do any good against liches - it certainly wouldn't allow any of the weapons special properties IMO. Click to expand... I consider it a shot "with the flat of the blade."
Jdvn1 Hanging in there. Better than the alternative. May 5, 2007 #14 moritheil said: I totally read that as "I'd hit it" on my first pass. Click to expand... Does that make it less true?
moritheil said: I totally read that as "I'd hit it" on my first pass. Click to expand... Does that make it less true?
