reiella
Explorer
Looking most likly towards the weekend one way or another in all truth currently as some people have time off then and can burn (including myself) to accomodate the talk...
Whether or not any change actually comes out I really could care less
. Only thing that I do care about is that the conflict addressed and at least ideas tossed around for percieved problems...
Minor things like, there being 10 defensive targets related to plants in general.... with 4 styles that are 'plants' (rose petal, cherry blossom, lotus blossom, thorn). Dragon having the two reptile and wyrm... Ki-Rin, chimera, manticore with no real 'direct' opposed... West wind with the 'four winds', 'air'... It can lead to some styles being more disadvantaged against (at in strategy matches, or if the judge does consider interaction... Which I know you hate seeing Vanor
). The downside to this is that there is weaker synergy with the style in general.
I do hope that it's somewhat obvious that discussion with the goal to compromise is a bit easier if it done real time...
There's also something to be said about seeing the proposed changes 'real time' for determining if something is a good idea or not
.
Now personally I really don't care much one way or the other... Only matters that really concern me all that much are the nature of some styles being 'unfairly' represented in the nouns/defense table, and that's mostly because I dislike the idea of some styles being greater than others (to a large extent, there are some location counters/synergies), although personally could care less either way. On those notes, the only thing that I'd really like is more synergy potential with moves, although I do feel a fair number of judges do not weight synergy as highly as I do personally
.
Whether or not any change actually comes out I really could care less

Minor things like, there being 10 defensive targets related to plants in general.... with 4 styles that are 'plants' (rose petal, cherry blossom, lotus blossom, thorn). Dragon having the two reptile and wyrm... Ki-Rin, chimera, manticore with no real 'direct' opposed... West wind with the 'four winds', 'air'... It can lead to some styles being more disadvantaged against (at in strategy matches, or if the judge does consider interaction... Which I know you hate seeing Vanor

I do hope that it's somewhat obvious that discussion with the goal to compromise is a bit easier if it done real time...
There's also something to be said about seeing the proposed changes 'real time' for determining if something is a good idea or not

Now personally I really don't care much one way or the other... Only matters that really concern me all that much are the nature of some styles being 'unfairly' represented in the nouns/defense table, and that's mostly because I dislike the idea of some styles being greater than others (to a large extent, there are some location counters/synergies), although personally could care less either way. On those notes, the only thing that I'd really like is more synergy potential with moves, although I do feel a fair number of judges do not weight synergy as highly as I do personally
