Warbringer
Explorer
Wormwood said:Simple. Clean. Intuitive.
This is the game I want to play.
My house rule dammit

Wormwood said:Simple. Clean. Intuitive.
This is the game I want to play.
"Bloody hell, chaps."Mistwell said:"Bloodied" is the state of being so roughed up that one is likely to start muttering "Bloody hell".
Darth Cyric said:Examples? Because I haven't seen this happen.
All the pro-4e sentiment I've seen is reactionary to the news as it comes out, and then, at best, hopeful speculation beyond this.
Nope, big difference. One of Mearls' points that were considered a problem in 3e that would be addressed in 4e was that magic was overpowered, and the nerfing of those spells look like a step in that direction. We expected this, some of us like it, some of us don't.Deep Blue 9000 said:http://www.enworld.org/showthread.php?t=220478
This thread is a good example of my point. Two pages of spells are released. Hong and Fourthbear cheer that wizards are nerfed (assuming that these two pages mean they are). This is no different from the OP complaining about all the damage spells from what we've seen. And in both cases, I believe their assumptions are reasonable and valid.
Cadfan said:Some criticisms are smart. Some are not. Some of the criticisms which are not smart are ones which rely on "X hasn't been disclosed yet, so there is no X." A legitimate response to arguments of this form is "Then shut up about it until either X is disclosed, or the full rules come out and you know there is no X."
There's a difference between saying "I wonder how 4E will address this," and saying "4E doesn't address this!"Elf Witch said:I have a question why is it wrong to have questions and concerns about 4E based on the fact that we don't have all the answers but it is okay ot be totally thrilled with the new rule set when we don't have all the answers?
Mistwell said:Think of it as instant heat exhaustion. No lung damage, but you might need some fluids before you feel entirely better after waking up.