L
lowkey13
Guest
*Deleted by user*
My table is 50/50 most the multi class is usually built around a concept and it is the best way too achieve that concept.So, in the 538 thread, someone mentioned how multiclassing might skew the numbers somewhat.
And that got me to thinking (always a dangerous thing) ... how common is multiclassing in 5e? It's something I'm genuinely curious about.
Here at enworld, we see a lot of talks of dips, or multiclass builds, but then sometimes people point out that MCing is optional, or that they don't multiclass.
I know that in my games, MCing is non-existent, but I also run games for kids (too complicated when learning) and grognards (DON'T TELL ME WHAT TO DO!), so ... I can't really make a general observation.
So, what is it? Is multiclassing really common, somewhat common, or not at all common?
Necessary Disclaimer. This is a poll of enworld. It is not a representative sample. It is for entertainment and/or discussion purposes. It is not the absolute truth, nor is it intended to be so.
So, I am putting up a 1-5 scale (typical) with no "lemon curry," "fanciful Lowkey13" options. Please base your experience based upon either-
Player: What you play as.
DM: What you see at your table.
Here's the scale.
1. No multiclassing.
2. Very little multiclassing. There's some, but it's rare or disfavored.
3. About 50/50 multiclassing.
4. Multiclassing is the rule, not the exception.
5. I always multiclass, or everyone I knows multiclasses.
So, what's it like for you, or at your table?