Recent content by Tellerve

I'm confused. Why would you need a ruling on that when it says in the PHB that the Fate of the Void is cumulative in the description?

Ahh, I see what you did there, you changed the name of Passive Checks, phb 179, DMG 26, to passive score to make your point. Yeah, so as you'll see from the rules, a passive check is a check, not a score, and from DMG 26 you can have passive Arcana, along with Dungeoneering, History, Nature...

Am I just totally missing something or is this a pretty bomb-diggity feat? Maybe it doesn't work for passive checks? Otherwise this is I think an auto-matic grab for sorcerers once they hit 11th level.

I have to say I really do like this idea. And I agree you wouldn't need money for higher level items, as you could either do the level restriction thing, or the fact it grows into you/you bend it to your will, or you could have to find rare components and make it less like an absolute cash...

Ongoing damage doesn't stack, so, that'd be a powerful house rule if you included both ongoing damages.

But you can't use sneak attack on the critical and then because of the property double up on sneak attack for that critical can you? It says in "this round" so I'm a tad fuzzy. If it was the one and only attack you made in the round and thus used your sneak attack on it and happened to also...

Huh,good one. Although I think since as far as I know there are no damaging Fear effects, ie 1d10 fear damage, then the fact the rage drake is immune to fear is to let you know it can't be hit with an Intimidate check to cow it into submitting. And there may be some other power that based on...

What about having the acid or fire damage decrease the amount of regeneration per round instead of auto disabling it? So if you did 7 points of fire damage it would regenerate 3 hit points instead of ten. If you did more then 10 then it doesn't regenerate that round. I kinda like this idea...

Whaa? Have you not read the multiple times it is stated that a new Mark supersedes a mark that was already in place? phb 77 In the Combat Challenge paragraph and then read phb 91 in Divine Challenge power. You're the one using house rules letting them stack.

In Siege at Bordrin's Watch, the second in the series of the Scales of War campaign there is a map and description, pretty good in fact, of Overlook. I will say though that I'm still a bit troubled by the 100' and increasing walls of Overlook. When I first read them I felt they seemed f'n...

Well I for one thank you for your expose :). I haven't gotten around to making any of my own monsters but enjoyed reading how you broke yours down. cheers,

I was thinking of doing this for a number of skills when I read in the PHB that it mentions it for Arcana and Dungeoneering. Which is great, and I think for all the monster checks a passive check might be nice. I was reading through one of the Scales of War adventures, Umbraforge, and there...

Where's this rule? The 15+1/2 level is for zones and conjurations but you are looking for the magical effects, which is 20+1/2 or was there errata bringing these all down by 5?

For those who have DM'd this scales of war adventure I have a couple questions. Or if you happen to have read it and can figure out the answers then by all means answer as well :) 1: I don't see that it was errata'd but Tusk has a standard attack that is +12 at 2d4+7 and then a secondary at...

I'm officially having this be the last comment I make in this thread as it became apparent that swaying opinions on the internet is pretty futile. But since I mentioned I was contacting customer service about this I figured I'd show their response. XXXXX, Thank you for writing. Black...