Search results

Slashing FLURRY is an abysmally weak feat under most circumstances. For a Standard Action, it is so-so at best, while totally crappy in a full attack. Thus, limited use, since most warriors either charge or use full attacks if possible - or they are Spring Attackers and are better off with...

-Snow Tiger Berserker (UE ?) feat -Catfolk Pounce

Somatic Weaponry (CM) feat?

And what did you want to tell us?

He'll have his normal AC - but since he'll be probably picking up the weapons/equipment he droped the round before, you're still in for an advantage in the next round.

Take both... ;) - No, honestly. MWM is indeed way better.

GATE. Good guy: DM usually has no good reason not to send the solar you requested to bust the BBEG. Neutral guy: DM: "sorry, the solars are lazy these days - try a marut". Player: $%//(%$!! Alignment can overcome DR - if you've got something like "Hellbound Knight", this might sometimes be...

It's basically the same thing as with Skewer Foe/Pulverize Foe/Flay Foe. Applying the logics of "different feats", you could make a bite-centered build with a +7/+8 to hit/damage that does +3d6 extra damage with every hit/round after the first. Sounds scary, will cost eight feats. I agree that...

Because unless a feat says you can stack its effects, you can't. Thus, it won't work with the morningstar either.

So it is.

So you play by D&D rules. Congratulations. ;) (apart from the "melee only" part, that is!) Apart from that, a double 20 is a crit, no matter the AC. Happens once every 400 times, shouldn't be that bad.

Just gave this a short look, but there are several faults already: AC's attack bonus is not a full fighter progression, it's a rogue/druid progression. Thus, your 3HD companion has a BAB +2. Your Druid level has NOTHING to do with your AC's BAB. You factor the AC's HD as normal, and then you...

Hey, that was no criticism from my side. As you might have seen, I just got reprimanded by the mods for what was a rather minuscle transgression (if any at all) - from my side of the pasture, that is. Just wanted to make shure lest I'd get my next lecturing on board rules.

I have cited the relevant passage PHB. As to my humble thinking, had they meant "Standard Action" they wouldn't have named it "Melee Attack". Now you can say they thought of this as a Standard Action & provided clue to this in the table - but it is still not what is written, even though...

A weapon with both 5' AND 10' range? That's pretty tough, don't you think so?

I'd rather pull fighter through to 20 and have my Devastating Critical by level 22. Mattdm is right: Does the fighter really increase in power by adding this? I think there's a dozen easier ways. (apart from not being a fighter in the first place ;) )

Thanx. I thought so. Alas, no elaborating on EB's North Korean topic. :)

That's no houserule at all. It's the WotC way of handling things, not only with critical hits. Same goes for damage doublings, charges, et. al. In your example, a Spirited Charge with a lance that confirmed a critical hit would do 9x base damage & the house rule only would bring it to 5x...

Just an EN-noob's question, are political comments okay on these boards?

So Skip Williams is ignorant of the game rules, and the text is wrong as well. Good to know...;)